Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012

Filetype[PDF-356.71 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Alternative Title:
      Int J Circumpolar Health
    • Description:
      Background

      The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends semi-annual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening using ultrasound (U.S.) in persons with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection at high risk for HCC such as Asian males aged ≥40 years and Asian females aged ≥50 years

      Objective

      To analyze the cost-effectiveness of 2 HCC screening methods in the Alaska Native (AN) health system: US-alone, or screening by alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) initially and switching to US for subsequent screenings if AFP >10 ng/mL (AFP→US)

      Design

      A spreadsheet-based model was developed for accounting the costs of 2 hypothetical HCC screening methods We used epidemiologic data from a cohort of 839 AN persons with CHB who were offered HCC screening by AFP/US semi-annually during 1983–2012 We assumed that compared with AFP→US, US-alone identifies 33% more tumors at an early stage (defined as a single tumor ≤5 cm or ≤3 tumors ≤3 cm in diameter) Years of life gained (YLG) attributed to screening was estimated by comparing additional years of survival among persons with early- compared with late-stage tumors Screening costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement rates in 2012 Future screening costs and YLG were projected over a 30-year time horizon using a 3% discount rate

      Results

      The total cost of screening for the cohort by AFP→US would have been approximately $357,000 ($36,000/early-stage tumor detected) compared to $814,000 ($59,000/early-stage tumor detected) by US-alone The AFP→US method would have yielded an additional 278 YLG ($13,000/YLG) compared with 389 YLG ($21,000/YLG) for US-alone Screening by US-alone would incur an additional $114,000 per extra early-tumor detected compared with AFP→US and $41,000 per extra YLG

      Conclusions

      Although US-alone HCC screening might have yielded more YLG than AFP→US, the reduced costs of the AFP→US method could expand access to HCC screening in resource constrained settings

    • Pubmed ID:
      27197711
    • Pubmed Central ID:
      PMC4873562
    • Document Type:
    • Collection(s):
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at stacks.cdc.gov