Comparing GPS, Log, Survey, and Accelerometry to Measure Physical Activity
Supporting Files
-
1 2016 ; 1-2016
-
Available in CDC Stacks on 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Am J Health Behav
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Objectives ; Both self-report and objective measures have strengths and limitations for studying physical activity (PA) and travel. We explored how objectively measured global positioning system (GPS) and accelerometer data matches with travel logs and questionnaires in predicting trip duration and PA. ; Methods ; In a study of PA and travel among residents in Atlanta, GA conducted in 2008–2009, 99 participants wore GPS devices and accelerometers, and recorded all trips in a log for 5 consecutive days. Participants also completed a self-administered questionnaire on PA and travel behaviors. ; Results ; There was good agreement between GPS and log for assessment of trip duration, although log measures overestimated trip duration (concordance correlation coefficient 0.53 0.47, 0.59; Bland-Altman estimate 0.76 0.16, 3.71 comparing GPS to log). Log measures underestimated light PA and overestimated moderate PA compared to accelerometry when greater than zero moderate PA was reported. ; Conclusions ; It is often not feasible to deploy accelerometry or GPS devices in population research because these devices are expensive and require technical expertise and data processing. Questionnaires and logs provide inexpensive tools to assess PA and travel with reasonable concordance with objective measures. However, they have shortcomings in evaluating the presence and amount of light and moderate PA. Future questionnaires and logs should be developed to evaluate sensitivity to light and moderate PA.
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Source:Am J Health Behav. 40(1):123-131
-
Pubmed ID:26685821
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC4866646
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Volume:40
-
Issue:1
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:65e5a6d51596650c8ea2d7912b0d7f29385ffff201dbe01b439fde122c426b8d
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access