Details:

Alternative Title:
Diagn Ther Endosc
Personal Author:
Li, Jun ; Nadel, Marion R. ; Poppell, Carolyn F. ; Dwyer, Diane M. ; Lieberman, David A. ; ... More +
Li, Jun ; Nadel, Marion R. ; Poppell, Carolyn F. ; Dwyer, Diane M. ; Lieberman, David A. ; Steinberger, Eileen K. Less -
Description:
This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005-2006 through Maryland Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. We evaluated 25 key data elements recommended by CO-RADS, including procedure indications, risk/comorbidity assessments, procedure technical descriptions, colonoscopy findings, specimen retrieval/pathology. Among 110 reports, 73% documented the bowel preparation quality and 82% documented specific cecal landmarks. For the 177 individual polyps identified, information on size and morphology was documented for 87% and 53%, respectively. Colonoscopy reporting varied considerately in the pre-CO-RADS period. The absence of key data elements may impact the ability to make recommendations for recall intervals. This paper provides baseline data to assess if CO-RADS has an impact on reporting and how best to improve the quality of reporting.
Subject:
[+]
Research Article

Source:
Diagn Ther Endosc. 2010; 2010.
Document Type:
Journal Article
Collection(s):
CDC Public Access
Main Document Checksum:
[+]
urn:sha256:17dfd58170e7460b5dd6d7a6e3dd652dc8964fc5947a0986cf3831dc61c527d2
File Type:

Supporting Files

• 	DTE2010-419796.nxml	txt
  	license.txt	txt

More +