RESPONSE TO WEINSTOCK AND SLATIN’S (2012) CRITIQUE OF IWH-NIOSH SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OSH TRAINING

ROBSON, LYNDA S.; SCHULTE, PAUL A.; AMICK, BENJAMIN C.; STEPHENSON, CAROL M.; IRVIN, EMMA L.

doi:10.2190/NS.23.2.b

Back to Previous Page

- Add this to...
- Twitter
- Facebook
- Google Bookmarks
- LinkedIn

RESPONSE TO WEINSTOCK AND SLATIN’S (2012) CRITIQUE OF IWH-NIOSH SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OSH TRAINING

Published Date:

Jan 01 2013

Publisher's site:

http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/NS.23.2.b New Site Icon

Source:

New Solut. 23(2):227-232.

[PDF-46.14 KB]

Details:

Personal Authors:

ROBSON, LYNDA S. ; SCHULTE, PAUL A. ; AMICK, BENJAMIN C. ; STEPHENSON, CAROL M. ; IRVIN, EMMA L. ;

Keywords:

[+]

Pubmed ID:

23896069

Pubmed Central ID:

PMC4623575

Description:

This commentary responds to the recent critique by Weinstock and Slatin [1] of our systematic review on the effectiveness of occupational safety and health (OSH) training conducted jointly by the Institute for Work & Health (IWH) in Canada and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the United States [2, 3]. We address misunderstandings of our perspectives on training, especially empowerment training, and the evaluation of such training.

Document Type:

Journal Article

Collection(s):

CDC Public Access

Funding:

CC999999/Intramural CDC HHS/United States

Main Document Checksum:

[+]

Supporting Files:

nihms730679.nxml

application/octet-stream

No Related Documents.