RESPONSE TO WEINSTOCK AND SLATIN’S (2012) CRITIQUE OF IWH-NIOSH SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OSH TRAINING

Details

• Alternative Title:
  New Solut
• Personal Author:
  ROBSON, LYNDA S. ; SCHULTE, PAUL A. ; AMICK, BENJAMIN C. ; STEPHENSON, CAROL M. ; IRVIN, EMMA L.
• Description:
  This commentary responds to the recent critique by Weinstock and Slatin [1] of our systematic review on the effectiveness of occupational safety and health (OSH) training conducted jointly by the Institute for Work & Health (IWH) in Canada and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the United States [2, 3]. We address misunderstandings of our perspectives on training, especially empowerment training, and the evaluation of such training.
• Subjects:
  Accidents, Occupational Article Education Evaluation Humans Inservice Training Occupational Health Review Training Workplace
• Source:
  New Solut. 23(2):227-232.
• Pubmed ID:
  23896069
• Pubmed Central ID:
  PMC4623575
• Document Type:
  Journal Article
• Funding:
  CC999999/Intramural CDC HHS/United States
• Volume:
  23
• Issue:
  2
• Collection(s):
  CDC Public Access
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha256:dbb9c2eadfe1ec81725748abde7548b5decd9f57a3470540c27e066dbdd6efd4
• Download URL:
  https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/36294/cdc_36294_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 46.14 KB ]