Public Perception of Birth Defects Terminology
Supporting Files
-
Sep 27 2012
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:BACKGROUND
‘Birth defect’ is a common phrase, yet concerns have been expressed that the word ‘defect’ carries a negative connotation. Our objective was to examine public perceptions of terms used to refer to birth defects.
METHODS
Four questions about terminology of birth defects were included in the U.S. nationally representative 2007 HealthStyles survey. Respondents answered questions about whether they or a family member were affected by birth defects (condition status), and which terms used to refer to birth defects they found preferable and which offensive. We further examined whether condition status, race/ethnicity, gender, income, geographical region, and education level impacted respondents’ term selection. Chi-square tests and multinomial logistic regression were performed using SAS 9.1.
RESULTS
‘Birth defects’ was most frequently selected as the first choice preferred term (35.4%), followed by 21.9% who selected ‘children with special needs.’ For respondents who said they themselves or a family member were affected by birth defects (11.5%), their responses differed statistically (p ≤ 0.0001) from nonaffected respondents, but the leading choices were still ‘birth defects’ (28.5%) and ‘children with special needs’ (27.2%). Condition status, race/ethnicity, gender, income, and education level were all significant predictors of the respondents’ choice of a preferred term. When asked which phrases might be offensive, the top choices were ‘none of the phrases listed’ (37.0%), ‘adverse pregnancy outcomes’ (23.1%), and ‘birth defects’ (21.4%).
CONCLUSIONS
‘Birth defect’ was the preferred term; however, survey participants affected by birth defects responded less positively to the term. Continued dialogue about accepted and appropriate terminology is necessary.
-
Subjects:
-
Source:Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 94(12):984-989.
-
Pubmed ID:23015510
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC4618792
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Volume:94
-
Issue:12
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:675ebdbe2d6bb4bcb85ce9aa7e70b25673627bbb78b301d8d2b398c9b36fea2e
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access