Agriculture, forestry, and fishing research at NIOSH; reviews of research programs of the National Institute for Occupational Safety ahd [sic] Health
Corporate Authors:National Research Council (U.S.), Committee to Review the NIOSH Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing Research Program.
Forests And Forestry
Prevention & Control
United States Government Agencies
Accidents, Occupational/Prevention & Control/United States
Forests And Forestry//Research/Evaluation/United States
United States Government Agencies/United States
Funding:211-2006-19152 (Task Order 001)
200-2005-10881 (Task Order 0004)
Series:Reviews of research programs of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health ; 3
Description:1. Introduction -- 2. The Ideal agriculture, foresty, and fishing research program -- 3. Overall program assessment -- 4. Review of surveillance research -- 5. Review of research on high-priority populations at risk -- 6. Review of health effects research -- 7. Review of intervention research -- 8. Review of outreach activities: knowledge diffusion and technology transferr -- 9. Other programmatic elements identified by the committee -- 10. Program scoring and rationale -- 11. New and emergeing research in agriculutural, forestry, and fishing safety and health -- 12. Recommendations for program improvement -- Glossary -- References -- Appendix A: Framework for the Review of Research Programs of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health -- Appendix B: Committee methods for gathering information -- Appendix C: Information provided by the NIOSH-AFF Program -- Appendix D: Biographic sketches of committee members -- Appendix E.: Mehods for identifying the agriculture, forestry , and fishing workforce population -- Appendix F: Policies and regulations affecting the agriculture, forresting, and fishing workforce -- Appendix G: Board on Agriculture and Natural Resoruces
The agriculture, forestry, and fishing sectors are the cornerstone of industries that produce and market food, fiber, and fuel. Collectively, the three sectors make up a huge component of the U.S. economy and are a major employer in the United States. Annually, these industries generate more than $1 trillion and create exports exceeding $68 billion. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) estimates that more than 5.5 million workers are employed in agriculture, forestry, and fishing. These sectors also consistently rank in the top six most hazardous occupations; fishermen and loggers have the highest fatality rates. Collectively, the three sectors consistently have the highest injury and fatality rates of any U.S. industries, so the overall effect on the safety and health of exposed populations in agricultural, forestry, and fishing worksites is enormous.
In conjunction with planned reviews of up to 15 NIOSH research programs, the National Research Council convened a committee of experts to review the NIOSH Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing Research Program (AFF Program) to evaluate the relevance of its work to improvements in occupational safety and health and the impact of NIOSH research in reducing workplace illnesses and injuries. Relevance was evaluated in terms of the priority of work carried out and its connection to improvements in workplace protection. Impact was evaluated in terms of its contributions to worker safety and health. The committee was also asked to assess the program’s identification and targeting of new research areas, to identify emerging research issues, and to provide advice on ways the program might be strengthened.
Using a five-point scoring scale (where 5 is highest), the committee converted its assessment of the relevance of AFF Program research into a score of 4 because research has been in high-priority and priority research areas, and research has resulted in some successful transfer activities. The committee arrived at this score after considerable deliberation: research carried out in some subprograms was more relevant than in others, and the program has been somewhat engaged in transfer activities, but not always the most appropriate. Had the committee been given the option of providing non-integer scores, the score for program relevance most likely would have been between 3 and 4. In addition, there was little evidence that the research activities, outputs, and intermediate outcomes contributed to the stated end outcomes of reducing workplace injury and illness. For this reason, the committee assigned the research program a score of 3 for impact, indicating that research program activities are ongoing and outputs are produced, which are likely to produce improvements in worker safety and health.
To enhance the relevance and impact of its work and fulfill its stated mission of providing national and world leadership to reduce workplace hazards through a focused program of research and prevention, the AFF Program should foster effective leadership to create a cohesive program, establish strategic goals, implement a comprehensive surveillance system that identifies and tracks worker populations at risk, engage stakeholders for input on research priorities, develop new approaches for technology and information dissemination, and incorporate current national developments in its targeting of new and emerging research areas.
This study was requested by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and supported by Contracts 211-2006-19152 (Task Order 001) and 200-2005-10881 (Task Order 0004).
Supporting Files:No Additional Files
You May Also Like: