Details:

Alternative Title:
BMC Public Health
Personal Author:
Anderka, Marlene ; Mai, Cara T. ; Romitti, Paul A. ; Copeland, Glenn ; Isenburg, Jennifer ; ... More +
Anderka, Marlene ; Mai, Cara T. ; Romitti, Paul A. ; Copeland, Glenn ; Isenburg, Jennifer ; Feldkamp, Marcia L. ; Krikov, Sergey ; Rickard, Russel ; Olney, Richard S. ; Canfield, Mark A. ; Stanton, Carol ; Mosley, Bridget ; Kirby, Russell S. Less -
Description:
Background

Population-based birth defects surveillance is a core public health activity in the United States (U.S.); however, the lack of national data quality standards has limited the use of birth defects surveillance data across state programs. Development of national standards will facilitate data aggregation and utilization across birth defects surveillance programs in the U.S.

Methods

Based on national standards for other U.S. public health surveillance programs, existing National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) guidelines for conducting birth defects surveillance, and information from birth defects surveillance programs regarding their current data quality practices, we developed 11 data quality measures that focused on data completeness (n = 5 measures), timeliness (n = 2), and accuracy (n = 4). For each measure, we established tri-level performance criteria (1 = rudimentary, 2 = essential, 3 = optimal). In January 2014, we sent birth defects surveillance programs in each state, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the U.S. Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Registry an invitation to complete a self-administered NBDPN Standards Data Quality Assessment Tool. The completed forms were electronically submitted to the CDC for analyses.

Results

Of 47 eligible population-based surveillance programs, 45 submitted a completed assessment tool. Two of the 45 programs did not meet minimum inclusion criteria and were excluded; thus, the final analysis included information from 43 programs. Average scores for four of the five completeness performance measures were above level 2. Conversely, the average scores for both timeliness measures and three of the four accuracy measures were below level 2. Surveillance programs using an active case-finding approach scored higher than programs using passive case-finding approaches for the completeness and accuracy measures, whereas their average scores were lower for timeliness measures.

Conclusions

This initial, nation-wide assessment of data quality across U.S. population-based birth defects surveillance programs highlights areas for improvement. Using this information to identify strengths and weaknesses, the birth defects surveillance community, working through the NBDPN, can enhance and implement a consistent set of standards that can promote uniformity and enable surveillance programs to work towards improving the potential of these programs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2223-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.


Subjects:
[+]
Congenital Abnormalities Data Accuracy Data Collection Humans Infant Population Surveillance Registries Residence Characteristics Time Factors
Source:
BMC Public Health. 15
Pubmed ID:
26386816
Pubmed Central ID:
PMC4575466
Document Type:
Journal Article
Funding:
U01 DD001035/DD/NCBDD CDC HHS/United States
Name as Subject:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Place as Subject:
United States
Collection(s):
CDC Public Access
Main Document Checksum:
[+]
urn:sha256:1dfb6d04e202ebf7e4ac7087a146710d91f0077dbeb195c77970d3737e8cc7fb
Download URL:
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/34450/cdc_34450_DS1.pdf
File Type:

Supporting Files

• 	12889_2015_2223_Fig1_HTML.gif	gif
  	12889_2015_2223_Fig1_HTML.jpg	jpeg
  	12889_2015_2223_MOESM1_ESM.docx	docx
  	12889_2015_Article_2223.nxml	xml

More +