Welcome to CDC stacks | Evaluation of Alternate Category Structures for the Strain Index: An Empirical Analysis - 34031 | Stephen B. Thacker CDC Library collection | CDC Public Access
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Evaluation of Alternate Category Structures for the Strain Index: An Empirical Analysis
  • Published Date:
    Feb 2014
  • Source:
    Hum Factors. 56(1):131-142.
Filetype[PDF-530.22 KB]


Details:
  • Pubmed ID:
    24669548
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC4557699
  • Description:
    Objective

    The purpose of this study was to develop alternative Strain Index risk classification categories.

    Background

    Strain Index scores are usually categorized into four Strain Index “risk categories.” The “original” risk categories were developed in the meat-packing industry and may not be fully applicable to other industries.

    Method

    Daily Strain Index scores were estimated among 276 manufacturing workers participating in a cohort study of occupational risk factors for hand–arm musculoskeletal symptoms. Each score was categorized using the original method and a new method based on quartiles of Strain Index score values among symptomatic participants. Models examining associations between original Strain Index risk categories and incident hand–arm symptoms were compared to models examining associations between the alternative Strain Index risk categories and incident hand–arm symptoms.

    Results

    Compared to the respective referent categories, a twofold or greater increase in the risk of incident hand–arm symptoms was observed for the highest original Strain Index risk category (HR = 2.06, 95% CI = [1.08–3.92]) and for the second highest alternate Strain Index risk exposure category (HR = 2.21, 95% CI = [1.26–3.85]). Although significant associations between Strain Index risk category and incident hand–arm symptoms were observed for both Strain Index categorization methods, model fit statistics favored the alternate approach.

    Conclusion

    Results from this study suggests that the Strain Index risk category structure may need to be tailored to specific populations.

    Application

    If verified, results from this study provide a better way to identify hazardous manufacturing jobs and target them for exposure reduction.

  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
    R01 OH007945/OH/NIOSH CDC HHS/United States
    R36 OH009486/OH/NIOSH CDC HHS/United States
    R36 OH009486-01/OH/NIOSH CDC HHS/United States
    CC999999/Intramural CDC HHS/United States
    1 U01 OH0007945-01/OH/NIOSH CDC HHS/United States
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like: