Comparison of PCR ribotyping and multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) for improved detection of Clostridium difficile
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All
i


Comparison of PCR ribotyping and multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) for improved detection of Clostridium difficile

Filetype[PDF-590.88 KB]



Details:

  • Alternative Title:
    BMC Microbiol
  • Description:
    Background Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyping is one of the globally accepted techniques for defining epidemic clones of Clostridium difficile and tracing virulence-related strains. However, the ambiguous data generated by this technique makes it difficult to compare data attained from different laboratories; therefore, a portable technique that could supersede or supplement PCR ribotyping should be developed. The current study attempted to use a new multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) panel to detect PCR-ribotype groups. In addition, various MLVA panels using different numbers of variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) loci were evaluated for their power to discriminate C. difficile clinical isolates. Results At first, 40 VNTR loci from the C. difficile genome were used to screen for the most suitable MLVA panel. MLVA and PCR ribotyping were implemented to identify 142 C. difficile isolates. Groupings of serial MLVA panels with different allelic diversity were compared with 47 PCR-ribotype groups. A MLVA panel using ten VNTR loci with limited allelic diversity (0.54-0.83), designated MLVA10, generated groups highly congruent (98%) with the PCR-ribotype groups. For comparison of discriminatory power, a MLVA panel using only four highly variable VNTR loci (allelic diversity: 0.94-0.96), designated MLVA4, was found to be the simplest MLVA panel that retained high discriminatory power. The MLVA10 and MLVA4 were combined and used to detect genetically closely related C. difficile strains. Conclusions For the epidemiological investigations of C. difficile, we recommend that MLVA10 be used in coordination with the PCR-ribotype groups to detect epidemic clones, and that the MLVA4 could be used to detect outbreak strains. MLVA10 and MLVA4 could be combined in four multiplex PCR reactions to save time and obtain distinguishable data.
  • Source:
    BMC Microbiol. 2011; 11:217.
  • Document Type:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • File Type:

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at stacks.cdc.gov