CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i
The role of tissue damage in whiplash associated disorders: Discussion paper 1
-
Dec 01 2011
-
-
Source: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 36(25 Suppl):S309-S315
[PDF-299.27 KB]
Details:
-
Alternative Title:Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:STUDY DESIGN
Non-systematic review of cervical spine lesions in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD).
OBJECTIVE
To describe whiplash injury models in terms of basic and clinical science, to summarize what can and cannot be explained by injury models, and to highlight future research areas to better understand the role of tissue damage in WAD.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
The frequent lack of detectable tissue damage has raised questions about whether tissue damage is necessary for WAD and what role it plays in the clinical context of WAD.
METHODS
Non-systematic review.
RESULTS
Lesions of various tissues have been documented by numerous investigations conducted in animals, cadavers, healthy volunteers and patients. Most lesions are undetected by imaging techniques. For zygapophysial (facet) joints, lesions have been predicted by bioengineering studies and validated through animal studies; for zygapophysial joint pain, a valid diagnostic test and a proven treatment are available. Lesions of dorsal root ganglia, discs, ligaments, muscles and vertebral artery have been documented in biomechanical and autopsy studies, but no valid diagnostic test is available to assess their clinical relevance. The proportion of WAD patients in whom a persistent lesion is the major determinant of ongoing symptoms is unknown. Psychosocial factors, stress reactions and generalized hyperalgesia have also been shown to predict WAD outcomes.
CONCLUSION
There is evidence supporting a lesion-based model in WAD. Lack of macroscopically identifiable tissue damage does not rule out the presence of painful lesions. The best available evidence concerns zygapophysial joint pain. The clinical relevance of other lesions needs to be addressed by future research.
-
Subjects:
-
Source:
-
Pubmed ID:22020601
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC3248632
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Volume:36
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
