Prevalence of Workers with Shifts in Hearing by Industry: A Comparison of OSHA and NIOSH Hearing Shift Criteria

Masterson, Elizabeth A.; Sweeney, Marie Haring; Deddens, James A.; Themann, Christa L.; Wall, David K.

doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000124

Advanced Search

Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

Advanced Search
Custom Query

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Prevalence of Workers with Shifts in Hearing by Industry: A Comparison of OSHA and NIOSH Hearing Shift Criteria

4 2014
By Masterson, Elizabeth A. ; Sweeney, Marie Haring ; Deddens, James A. ; ...
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000124
Source: J Occup Environ Med. 56(4):446-455

[PDF-387.92 KB]

English

Details Supporting Files You May Also Like

Details:

Alternative Title:

J Occup Environ Med
Personal Author:

Masterson, Elizabeth A. ; Sweeney, Marie Haring ; Deddens, James A. ; Themann, Christa L. ; Wall, David K.

Masterson, Elizabeth A. ; Sweeney, Marie Haring ; Deddens, James A. ; Themann, Christa L. ; Wall, David K. Less -
Description:

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of workers with National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health significant threshold shifts (NSTS), Occupational Safety and Health Administration standard threshold shifts (OSTS), and with OSTS with age correction (OSTS-A), by industry using North American Industry Classification System codes.

Methods

2001-2010 worker audiograms were examined. Prevalence and adjusted prevalence ratios for NSTS were estimated by industry. NSTS, OSTS and OSTS-A prevalences were compared by industry.

Results

20% of workers had an NSTS, 14% had an OSTS and 6% had an OSTS-A. For most industries, the OSTS and OSTS-A criteria identified 28-36% and 66-74% fewer workers than the NSTS criteria, respectively.

Conclusions

Use of NSTS criteria allowing for earlier detection of shifts in hearing is recommended for improved prevention of occupational hearing loss.
Keywords:

[+]

Adolescent Adult Audiometry, Pure-Tone Cross-Sectional Studies Female Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced Humans Industry Male Middle Aged National Institute For Occupational Safety And Health, U.S. Occupational Diseases Occupational Exposure Prevalence Retrospective Studies Risk Factors United States United States Occupational Safety And Health Administration
Source:

J Occup Environ Med. 56(4):446-455
Pubmed ID:

24662953
Pubmed Central ID:

PMC4535326
Document Type:

Journal Article
Funding:

CC999999/Intramural CDC HHSUnited States/
Volume:

56
Issue:

4
Collection(s):

CDC Public Access
Main Document Checksum:

[+]

urn:sha256:a58e61cc660799f26e16b51f6f9bfef2175061eae0652870f28ab9f52da86b38
Download URL:

https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/32861/cdc_32861_DS1.pdf
File Type:

nihms-704539.nxml

xml

More +