U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

What we Don’t Know Can Hurt us: Nonresponse Bias Assessment in Birth Defects Research

Supporting Files


Details

  • Alternative Title:
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol
  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Background

    Nonresponse bias assessment is an important and underutilized tool in survey research to assess potential bias due to incomplete participation. This study illustrates a nonresponse bias sensitivity assessment using a survey on perceived barriers to care for children with orofacial clefts in North Carolina.

    Methods

    Children born in North Carolina between 2001 and 2004 with an orofacial cleft were eligible for inclusion. Vital statistics data, including maternal and child characteristics, were available on all eligible subjects. Missing ‘responses’ from nonparticipants were imputed using assumptions based on the distribution of responses, survey method (mail or phone), and participant maternal demographics.

    Results

    Overall, 245 of 475 subjects (51.6%) responded to either a mail or phone survey. Cost as a barrier to care was reported by 25.0% of participants. When stratified by survey type, 28.3% of mail respondents and 17.2% of phone respondents reported cost as a barrier. Under various assumptions, the bias-adjusted estimated prevalence of cost as barrier to care ranged from 16.1% to 30.0%. Maternal age, education, race, and marital status at time of birth were not associated with subjects reporting cost as a barrier.

    Conclusion

    As survey response rates continue to decline, the importance of assessing the potential impact of nonresponse bias has become more critical. Birth defects research is particularly conducive to nonresponse bias analysis, especially when birth defect registries and birth certificate records are used. Future birth defect studies which use population-based surveillance data and have incomplete participation could benefit from this type of nonresponse bias assessment.

  • Subjects:
  • Source:
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2015; 103(7):603-609.
  • Pubmed ID:
    26173046
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC4514019
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Volume:
    103
  • Issue:
    7
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:347cd6266418d04a7e05773ac1e3d01d3b0f82efa29d53e6da451766ed9e9715
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 342.45 KB ]
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.