Welcome to CDC Stacks | Provider beliefs associated with cervical cancer screening interval recommendations: A pilot study in Federally Qualified Health Centers☆ - 32343 | CDC Public Access
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Provider beliefs associated with cervical cancer screening interval recommendations: A pilot study in Federally Qualified Health Centers☆
Filetype[PDF - 689.88 KB]


Details:
  • Pubmed ID:
    26203428
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC4508246
  • Description:
    Background

    Among providers who serve low-income and uninsured women, resistance to extending the cervical cancer screening interval following normal Pap and co-test results has been documented. Our objective was to examine provider characteristics and beliefs associated with guideline-consistent screening interval recommendations.

    Method

    We collected cross-sectional survey data between 2009 and 2010 from 82 primary care providers in six Federally Qualified Health Centers in Illinois, USA. The relationships between characteristics, beliefs, and screening interval recommendations (1 year vs. 3 years) were tested with Pearson chi-square, negative binomial and ordered logistic regression.

    Results

    Compared to providers who recommended annual intervals after a normal co-test, providers who recommended a guideline-consistent (i.e., 3 years) screening interval were significantly more likely to report the goodness, ease, and benefit of their recommendation and perceived encouragement for a 3-year interval from professional organizations and journals (p < .05). Providers who recommended a 3-year interval were also less likely to report that longer intervals increase patient risk for cervical cancer (p < .05). Interval recommendations were not associated with provider specialty, gender, or years in practice.

    Conclusion

    Messages that promote the benefits of longer screening intervals after a normal co-test, the natural history of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer, and low risk of developing cancer with a longer interval may be useful to promote evidence-based screening in this population of Federally Qualified Health Center providers. Dissemination of targeted messages through professional journals and specialty organizations should be considered.

  • Document Type:
  • Collection(s):
  • Funding:
    FSX3/Intramural CDC HHS/United States
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like: