Optimizing Enrollment in Employer Health Programs: A Comparison of Enrollment Strategies in the Diabetes Health Plan
Supporting Files
-
Aug 01 2014
-
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Am J Manag Care
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Background
Many health programs struggle with low enrollment rates.
Objectives
To compare the characteristics of populations enrolled in a new health plan when employer groups implement voluntary versus automatic enrollment approaches.
Research Design
We analyzed enrollment rates from two different strategies: voluntary or automatic enrollment. We used regression modeling to estimate the associations of patient characteristics with the probability of enrolling within each strategy.
Subjects
5,014 eligible employees from 11 self-insured employers who had purchased the Diabetes Health Plan (DHP), which offers free or discounted copayments for diabetes related medications, testing supplies, and physician visits. Six employers used voluntary enrollment while five used automatic enrollment.
Measures
The main outcome of interest was enrollment into the DHP. Predictors were gender, age, race/ethnicity, dependent status, household income, education level, number of comorbidities, and employer group.
Results
Overall, the proportion of eligible members who were enrolled within the automatic enrollment strategy was 91% compared with 35% for voluntary enrollment. Income was a significant predictor for voluntary enrollment but not for automatic enrollment. Within automatic enrollment, covered dependents, Hispanics, and persons with one non-diabetes comorbidity were more likely to enroll than other subgroups. Employer group was also a significant correlate of enrollment. Notably, all demographic groups had higher DHP enrollment rates under automatic enrollment than under voluntary enrollment.
Conclusions
For employer-based programs that struggle with low enrollment rates, especially among certain employee subgroups, an automatic enrollment strategy may not only increase the total number of enrollees but may also decrease some enrollment disparities.
-
Subjects:
-
Source:Am J Manag Care. 20(8):e311-e319
-
Pubmed ID:25295794
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC4353493
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Place as Subject:
-
Volume:20
-
Issue:8
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:59d4d8f771e1527f504d74615c4b53aa8e766eb47d2a77a57e885c6b2722e23a
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access