Assessing the American Public's Preferences For Reforms to Teen Driving Licensure Systems: a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Supporting Files
-
January 2026
-
Available in CDC Stacks on January 21, 2026, 12:00 AM
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 2026, v. 32, no. 1: Assessing the American Public's Preferences For Reforms to Teen Driving Licensure Systems: a Discrete Choice Experiment.
-
Journal Article:Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:To analyse factors influencing the American public's preferences for changes to teenage driver licensing requirements.
We employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with 808 participants from National Opinion Research Center's AmeriSpeak panel to assess preferences for two existing elements (on-road testing and intermediate licensure period) and a new feature (driver monitoring with telematics during the intermediate licensure period) of licensing system. Multinomial and mixed logit models were used to estimate preference weights, marginal rates of substitution and the relative importance of each attribute.
Among 730 respondents who completed all DCE choice tasks, we found robust support for changes to teenage driver licensing requirements, with preferences varying by individual characteristics. Respondents expressed a high baseline support for changes to teen driving licensure policies. They favoured testing, prioritising easy tests and opposed prolonged driver monitoring and extended intermediate licensure periods. Baseline preference weights exhibited substantial heterogeneity, emphasising the diversity of public preferences. The marginal rates of substitution revealed a preference for extended driver monitoring over an extended intermediate licensure period. An easy test was valued at 2.85 times more than a hard one. The most influential attributes were the length of intermediate licence period and testing requirements, with the former twice as important.
Our study found robust support for reforms to teenage driver licensing requirements, favouring easier on-road driving tests over an extended period of intermediate licensure and driver monitoring. Public preferences for licensing systems need to be balanced with the broader policy objectives including optimising mobility and maximising safety. -
Content Notes:Author manuscript
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Source:Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 2026, v. 32, no. 1
-
DOI:
-
ISSN:1353-8047 ; 1475-5785
-
Pubmed ID:39074981
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC11775242
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
Pages in Document:64-71 (20 pdf pages)
-
Volume:32
-
Issue:1
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:3d106dbf72c68689768add7ab3fffb2b213bbcc16127ff8fd17b4f50750541034d46d8449966aa40caa14bb0b89cdaf0b44f8a0737b20ec415c8322e17cc748c
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access