Patient Navigators Improve In-Office Eye Exam Adherence After Community Eye Screenings in a Randomized Clinical Trial: NYC-SIGHT Study.
Supporting Files
-
June 2025
-
Available in CDC Stacks on December 11, 2025, 12:00 AM
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2025, v. 274: Patient Navigators Improve In-Office Eye Exam Adherence After Community Eye Screenings in a Randomized Clinical Trial: NYC-SIGHT Study.
-
Journal Article:American Journal of Ophthalmology
-
Personal Author:HARK, LISA A. ; GORROOCHURN, PRAKASH ; PIZZI, LAURA T. ; JUTKOWITZ, ERIC ; GOULAK, ANNETTE M. ; MARURI, STEFANIA C. ; HARIZMAN, NOGA ; HOROWITZ, JASON D. ; PARK, LISA ; WANG, QING ; DIAMOND, DANIEL F. ; VALENZUELA, IVES A. ; TORRES, DESIREE R. ; WANG, YUJIA ; SHARMA, TARUN ; LIEBMANN, JEFFREY M. ; CIOFFI, GEORGE A.
-
Description:To assess the effectiveness and cost of patient navigators in improving adherence to an initial in-office eye exam following community-based eye health screenings and referral to ophthalmology among underserved populations.
5-year prospective, cluster-randomized clinical trial.
Eligible individuals aged 40 years and older were recruited from affordable housing developments and senior centers in Upper Manhattan.
Demographics, social determinants of health, clinical characteristics, and access to eye care were collected. Eye health screenings included visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and fundus photography. Those diagnosed with glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, retinal abnormalities, cataracts, or other ocular conditions were referred for in-office eye exams, with initial appointments scheduled by study staff. Navigator Intervention participants received appointment scheduling support for 10 months, Usual Care participants did not receive navigator assistance. T tests, chi-square tests and multivariate stepwise logistic regression analyzed factors associated with adherence. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside the study.
Adherence to the initial in-office eye exam for those referred to ophthalmology.
Of 468 referred participants, 47% (n = 220/468) attended the initial in-office eye exam. Adherence rates: Navigator Intervention (51.8%) versus Usual Care (38.1%). Of those who attended the in-office eye exam, mean age: 70.2 ± 11.3 years; 65.5% female; 46.8% African American, 47.3% Hispanic. Participants in the Navigator Intervention group had higher odds of adhering to the initial in-office eye exam compared to those receiving Usual Care (OR = 1.529; 95% CI (1.023, 2.285)). Participants who spoke English as their primary language also had higher odds of adhering to the initial eye exam (OR = 1.815; 95% CI (1.211, 2721)). Cost per participant in the Navigator Intervention group who attended the in-office eye exam: $24.25 vs. $33.03 per Usual Care participant.
Patient navigators improved adherence to in-office eye exams following community-based eye health screenings and referral to ophthalmology among an underserved population. The Navigator Intervention resulted in cost savings with an incremental cost-effectiveness difference of $8.78 less per participant randomized to the Navigator Intervention group. -
Content Notes:Author manuscript
-
Subjects:
- Adult
- Aged
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Appointments and Schedules
- Community Health Services
- Eye Diseases
- Health Services Accessibility
- Intraocular Pressure
- Patient Compliance
- Patient Navigation
- Prospective Studies
- Referral and Consultation
- Vision Screening
- Visual Acuity
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
-
Source:American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2025, v. 274
-
DOI:
-
ISSN:0002-9394 ; 1879-1891
-
Pubmed ID:40015588
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC12697009
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
Pages in Document:54-66 (25 pdf pages)
-
Volume:274
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:2b76e675dd41221fe75a9820026d5927eab31cf49825753a824df3da5b6933e6aa588f9eae81552ff29d5fc45e3101e817588dfa4da9966664ad5cbb0ef039ef
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access