Placental Abruption and Perinatal Mortality: Abnormal Placentation and Spontaneous Abortion as Contributors to Left Truncation Bias.
Supporting Files
-
February 2026
-
Available in CDC Stacks on August 16, 2025, 12:00 AM
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2026, v. 40, no. 2: Placental Abruption and Perinatal Mortality: Abnormal Placentation and Spontaneous Abortion as Contributors to Left Truncation Bias.
-
Journal Article:Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Generally, studies in perinatal epidemiology restrict cohort entry to 20 weeks of gestation, but exposures and outcomes may occur earlier. This restriction may introduce left truncation bias.
To examine the impact of left truncation bias when estimating the causal effect of abruption on perinatal mortality in the context of abnormal placentation, with spontaneous abortion (SAB) as a censoring event.
Through 80 Monte Carlo simulation scenarios based on realistic clinical assumptions, we estimated risk differences (RD), risk ratios (RR) and bias parameters for the abruption-perinatal mortality association.
Censoring by SAB ranged from 5.6% to 7.6% across simulation setups. The risk of mortality was overestimated in observable (left-truncated) data at ≥ 20 weeks compared to an unobservable cohort starting follow-up at placental implantation (conception cohort). Underestimation of risks was stronger among abruption pregnancies. RDs for the abruption-mortality association were biased by +1% to +3% among conceptions with normal implantation and by +5% to +43% among abnormal placentation. Due to the disproportionate underestimation of mortality among nonabruption pregnancies, RRs were overestimated by 1.1 to 1.2-fold for normal implantations and by 1.1 to 8.4-fold for abnormal implantations.
The findings of this simulation study highlight the critical importance of placentation in successful pregnancy. Abnormal placentation has profound consequences for unsuccessful pregnancies, remarkably increasing the risks of early losses, placental abruption and other obstetrical complications. This study underscores that left truncation can bias the abruption-perinatal mortality association, differentially by whether the placentation was normal or abnormal. However, defining the causal question regarding the abruption-perinatal mortality association requires consideration of the target population, which may include all conceptions. In studies of these effects, outcome follow-up capability may introduce left truncation bias. We do not prescribe one analytic approach to account for left truncation, but rather, the approach should be guided by the causal question. -
Content Notes:Author manuscript
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
- Placental abruption
- Perinatal mortality
- Abnormal placentation
- Left truncation
- Selection bias
- Spontaneous abortion
- Depletion of susceptible
- Monte-Carlo simulation
- abnormal placentation
- depletion of susceptible
- left truncation
- Monte‐Carlo simulation
- perinatal mortality
- placental abruption
- selection bias
- spontaneous abortion
-
Source:Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2026, v. 40, no. 2
-
DOI:
-
ISSN:0269-5022 ; 1365-3016
-
Pubmed ID:40471631
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC12353283
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:R01 HL150065/HL/NHLBI NIH HHSUnited States/ ; U01 DD001293/DD/NCBDD CDC HHSUnited States/ ; U01-DD001293/CC/CDC HHSUnited States/ ; R01 AG056479/AG/NIA NIH HHSUnited States/ ; R01-HL150065/HL/NHLBI NIH HHSUnited States/ ; R01-AG056479/AG/NIA NIH HHSUnited States/ ; R01 ES033190/ES/NIEHS NIH HHSUnited States/ ; R01-ES033190/ES/NIEHS NIH HHSUnited States/ ; R01-HL150065/HL/NHLBI NIH HHSUnited States/ ; R01-ES033190/ES/NIEHS NIH HHSUnited States/ ; R01-AG056479/AG/NIA NIH HHSUnited States/ ; U01-DD001293/CC/CDC HHSUnited States/
-
Genre:
-
Pages in Document:133-143 (18 pdf pages)
-
Volume:40
-
Issue:2
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:54f3aab09b0a3cda75045c539fddd9656ece1a397da788bdde99dbf9549ce2d2531036deab4de4dd7bd1cd4a886b9a670cf5867a51267b8712d0fbae56e1a8c7
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access