Disentangling the relationship between gender and work-family conflict: an integration of theoretical perspectives using meta-analytic methods.
-
2017/12/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Implicit in many discussions of work-family issues is the idea that managing the work-family interface is more challenging for women than men. We address whether this intuition is supported by the empirical data via a meta-analysis of gender differences in work-family conflict (WFC) based on more than 350 independent samples (N > 250,000 workers). Challenging lay perceptions, our results demonstrate that men and women generally do not differ on their reports of WFC, though there were some modest moderating effects of dual-earner status, parental status, type of WFC (i.e., time-, strain-, vs. behavior-based), and when limiting samples to men and women who held the same job. To better understand the relationship between gender and WFC, we engaged in theory-testing of mediating mechanisms based on commonly invoked theoretical perspectives. We found evidence in support of the rational view, no support for the sensitization and male segmentation perspectives, and partial support for the asymmetrical domain permeability model. Finally, we build theory by seeking to identify omitted mediators that explain the relationship between gender and work-interference-with-family, given evidence that existing theoretically specified mechanisms are insufficient to explain this relationship. Overall, we find more evidence for similarity rather than difference in the degree of WFC experienced by men and women. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0021-9010
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:102
-
Issue:12
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20064916
-
Citation:J Appl Psychol 2017 Dec; 102(12):1601-1635
-
Contact Point Address:Kristen M. Shockley, Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, 125 Baldwin Street, Athens, GA 30602
-
Email:kshock@uga.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2018
-
Performing Organization:Sunshine Education and Research Center, University of South Florida
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:Journal of Applied Psychology
-
End Date:20290630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:b5336d3ded71c5397daba00dd70507443662760cff1c0263978ca2cf3b57e931b2d2dad1f96dc78d5cf0a8d6aaa327195a7e41a6700fc54cb7f64f244ad8806c
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like