The impact of keyboard design on comfort and productivity in a text-entry task.
Public Domain
-
1997/02/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:The effect of alternative keyboard design features on musculoskeletal discomfort was examined. The subjects consisted of 50 female clerical workers able to type 40 to 55 words per minute. The standard keyboard was referred to as Keyboard-A. The alternative keyboards were split into halves. The keyboard halves of Keyboard-C inclined laterally, with the keys arranged in a concave format. The keyboard halves of Keyboard-D were laterally inclined, while those of Keyboard-E were laterally inclined and rotated. When Keyboard-D was tested in the flat position, it was referred to as Keyboard-B. Two handed text entry tasks were performed in adjustable workstations over 3 days; on the first day, the standard keyboard was used. Musculoskeletal pain and fatigue were assessed by the subjects. Based on the number of keystrokes per hour, the overall performance was significantly poorer for Keyboard-C than for Keyboard-D or Keyboard-A. Although performance on Keyboard-C and Keyboard-E was significantly lower on day two than on day one, performance improved across the workday, improving overall by day three. No significant differences in the number of errors per hour were determined among the keyboards. In general, the different keyboard designs did not significantly affect musculoskeletal discomfort or fatigue levels. While physical discomfort increased across each workday and across the study period, and fatigue increased across each workday, discomfort and fatigue levels were generally low. The authors conclude that alternative keyboard usage only minimally affects performance, discomfort, and fatigue after a 2 day trial period. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0003-6870
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:9-16
-
Volume:28
-
Issue:1
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:00235086
-
Citation:Appl Ergon 1997 Feb; 28(1):9-16
-
Federal Fiscal Year:1997
-
NORA Priority Area:
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Source Full Name:Applied Ergonomics
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:7dc847c09aedf140bc731323e8446b4703641ae07d6ad9e7b7238120dab30b8f7dcaa9b938d34d035f87873a0fe7fec262d5d13dcaf290925445e82b6de3b57d
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like