The Evaluation of Worker Exposure to Airborne Silica Dust During Five OSHA Table I Construction Tasks
-
2023/06/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Fifty-one (51) personal silica air samples were collected over 13 days on 19 construction employees while they performed five different construction tasks found in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) respirable crystalline silica standard for construction, Table 1, which specifies engineering, work practice, and respiratory protection controls that employers can use in lieu of exposure monitoring to adhere to the standard. The average construction task time was 127 min (range: 18-240 min) with a mean respirable silica concentration of 85 µg m-3 (standard deviation [SD] = 176.2) for all 51 measured exposures. At least one OSHA-specified silica dust control measure was used during all 51 samples collected. The mean silica concentrations for the five tasks were: core drilling 11.2 µg m-3 (SD = 5.31 µg m-3), cutting with a walk-behind saw 126 µg m-3 (SD = 115 µg m-3), dowel drilling 99.9 µg m-3 (SD = 58.7 µg m-3), grinding 172 µg m-3 (SD = 145 µg m-3), and jackhammering 23.2 µg m-3 (SD = 5.19 µg m-3). Twenty four of 51 (47.1%) workers were exposed above the OSHA Action Level (AL) of 25 µg m-3 and 15 of 51 (29.4%) were exposed above the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 50 µg m-3 when exposures were extrapolated to an 8-h shift. When silica exposures were extrapolated to 4 h, 15 of 51 (29.4%) of workers sampled were exposed over the OSHA AL and 8 of 51 (15.7%) were exposed over the OSHA PEL. A total of 15 area airborne respirable crystalline silica samples were collected on days where the personal task-based silica samples were taken, with an average sampling time of 187 min. Of the 15 area respirable crystalline silica samples, only four were greater than the laboratory reporting limit of 5 µg m-3. The four area silica samples with reportable concentrations revealed background silica concentrations of 23 µg m-3, 5 µg m-3, 40 µg m-3, and 100 µg m-3. Odds ratios were used to analyze the apparent association between dichotomous background construction site exposures to respirable crystalline silica (detectable or not detectable), and personal exposure category (over or not over the OSHA AL and PEL) when exposure times were extrapolated to 8 h. The associations were strongly positive and significant between detectable background exposures and personal overexposures for workers conducting the five Table 1 tasks with engineering controls in place. The results of this study suggest that exposure to hazardous levels of respirable crystalline silica may be present even when OSHA-specified engineering controls are implemented. The current study findings also suggest that background construction site silica concentrations may potentially cause task-based overexposures, even when the OSHA Table 1 control methods have been put in place. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:2398-7308
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:67
-
Issue:5
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20067407
-
Citation:Ann Work Expo Health 2023 Jun; 67(5):572-583
-
Contact Point Address:Emily J Cothern, Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, 1681 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1681, United States
-
Email:cothern.ej@gmail.com
-
CAS Registry Number:
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2023
-
Performing Organization:University of Colorado, Denver
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20070701
-
Source Full Name:Annals of Work Exposures and Health
-
End Date:20250630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:442f7d0cc88b37a22928b3b9e8455843bd8683c114fe6806611611957915b0b19861ea04008fb1f9c08c542f896cbe223654e8ac04e9955a501d55ad8e301dad
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like