Online Survey of University Students’ Perception, Awareness and Adherence to COVID-19 Prevention Measures
-
2022/05/13
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Background: Determining factors correlated with protective measures against COVID-19 is important to improve public health response. This study describes student opinions related to university COVID-19 preventive measures. Methods: In fall 2020, 643 US university students completed an online survey on perception, awareness, and adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures. Outcomes included protocol effectiveness (self or others), protocol adherence (self or others), consequences of protocol violation, knowledge of violations, and level of concern for COVID-19. Multiple linear regression models determined correlates of outcome variables. Covariates included gender, race, residence, area of study, class, and knowledge of someone with a positive COVID-19 test. Results: Overall, students agreed with protective measures (equivalent to higher scores). In adjusted linear models, females (versus males) had significantly higher scores for protocol effectiveness (self) (p < 0.001), consequences of protocol violation (p = 0.005), and concern about COVID-19 (p < 0.001). Asian/Pacific Islander (versus white) had significantly higher scores for protocol effectiveness (self) (p < 0.001), consequences of protocol violation (p = 0.008), and concern about COVID-19 (p = 0.001). Graduate students (versus freshman) had higher scores for protocol effectiveness (self) (p < 0.001), protocol adherence (self) (p = 0.004) and concern about COVID-19 (p < 0.001). In contrast, participants who had a positive COVID-19 test had significantly lower scores for protocol effectiveness (self) (p = 0.02), protocol adherence (self) (p = 0.004), and consequences of protocol violation (p = 0.008). Conclusion: Overall, females, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and graduate students were more likely to agree with or adhere to COVID-19 prevention guidelines but those who tested positive for COVID-19 were less likely to do so. These results may inform future prevention efforts. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1471-2458
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:22
-
Issue:1
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20067206
-
Citation:BMC Public Health 2022 May; 22(1):964
-
Contact Point Address:Ellen M. Wells, Department of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
-
Email:wells54@purdue.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2022
-
Performing Organization:Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20010701
-
Source Full Name:BMC Public Health
-
End Date:20270630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:fac9d4b269897c1cc56b13687179fb620562134f35f67a119819d8319cd616599b3685b3a7fb6f3ba02b2bf353e9efbcd4ef20f752907dc28b774604cb8e67bc
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like