A Comparison of Respirable Crystalline Silica Concentration Measurements Using a Direct-on-Filter Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Transmission Method vs. a Traditional Laboratory X-Ray Diffraction Method
-
2018/10/01
-
-
Series: Mining Publications
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Evaluation and control of respirable crystalline silica (RCS) exposures are critical components of an effective mine industrial hygiene program. To provide more timely exposure data in the field, an end-of-shift Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometry method has been developed for evaluation of direct-on-filter RCS. The present study aimed to apply this FT-IR method using field samples collected in three Northwestern U.S. metal/nonmetal mines and compare the results to traditional laboratory X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD). Seventy-five dust samples were analysed using both methods. Samples for each mine were split in half by random assignment, with half used to create a calibration factor for the FT-IR analysis and half used to apply the calibration. Non-parametric correlational and two-sample comparative tests were used to assess the strength of association and the level of agreement between the two methods. Strong, positive correlations were observed between FT-IR and XRD RCS concentrations, with Spearman rank correlation coefficients ranging between 0.84 and 0.97. The mean RCS concentrations determined though FT-IR analysis were lower than through XRD analysis, with mean differences ranging from -4 to -133 ug/m3 and mean percent errors ranging from 12% to 28%. There was a statistically significant improvement in the level of agreement between log FT-IR and log XRD RCS concentrations following calibration at two of the three mines, with mean differences of -0.03 (p = 0.002) and -0.02 (p = 0.044) in the log scale. The reduction in mean difference following calibration at the other mine was not statistically significant (mean log scale difference = -0.05, p = 0.215), but the differences between FT-IR and XRD were not significantly different without calibration (mean log scale difference = -0.07, p = 0.534). The results indicate that mine-specific calibration factors can improve the level of agreement between RCS concentrations determined via a field-based, end-of-shift FT-IR method in metal/non-metal mines as compared to traditional XRD analysis. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Series:
-
ISSN:1545-9624
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:15
-
Issue:10
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20051898
-
Citation:J Occup Environ Hyg 2018 Oct; 15(10):743-754
-
Contact Point Address:Emanuele Cauda, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh Mining Research Division, Dust Control, Ventilation and Toxic Substances Branch, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15236
-
Email:ecauda@cdc.gov
-
CAS Registry Number:
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2019
-
Performing Organization:Montana Technological University
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
-
End Date:20290630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:fd3882c8da87836251b9e647b220936cce6c4ae1d7ed574e992a26d0ecf7baa48c73aef3ba8b96c91a2029a685d0d9cd88ba5a6cf0342838ec76c97cb1bf2484
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like