Research to Practice to Research: Part 2 – an Academic’s Perspective
-
2016/09/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:Borchardt JG ; Choi SD ; Duraj V ; Fathallah F ; Goddard D ; Marras WS ; Reid CR ; Rempel D ; Robertson M ; Silva H
-
Description:This is the second of two panels to discuss pathways and barriers in moving promising ergonomic concepts from research to practice and in moving important ergonomic problems from practice to research. The panelists are from a variety of industry sectors and academia. The session will start with a 5-minute introductory statement from each panelist; therefore, most of the session will be a discussion between panelists and the audience on the topic. On the research side there is difficulty in conducting good research capable of demonstrating a safety or productivity value for promising ergonomic interventions. Problems include poor access to workplaces to conduct the research, lack of funding, difficulty obtaining a control group, etc. Some practitioners believe that well-designed research is not necessary for industry to make decisions on adoption. On the industry side barriers to adopting promising ergonomic interventions include lack of convincing data, cost, anticipation of reduced productivity, poor usability, poor acknowledgement of a problem, and history/legacy ("we have always done it this way and the process works"). Likewise, practitioners may have difficulty convincing academics to study ergonomic problems that they face daily in the workplace and they may perceive that academics study concepts that have little value for industry. Barriers for academics to take on these important topics may be related to funding, lack of clear design related solutions, limited impact, and research on a topic that is too applied or related to a proprietary idea. The goal is to improve understanding of different perspectives and generate ideas for improving the process of research to practice to research (RtPtR). [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1071-1813
-
Publisher:
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:California ; Iowa ; Maryland ; Massachusetts ; Ohio ; OSHA Region 1 ; OSHA Region 3 ; OSHA Region 4 ; OSHA Region 5 ; OSHA Region 7 ; OSHA Region 9 ; South Carolina ; Wisconsin
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:60
-
Issue:1
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20063075
-
Citation:Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting, September 19-23, 2016, Washington, DC. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2016 Sep; 60(1):902-905
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2016
-
Performing Organization:University of California, Berkeley
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting, September 19-23, 2016, Washington, DC
-
End Date:20250630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:1af3837e670261487cf7b6bfc05edad9620990b100fc46b3e52553c1f5a66d663f4a30930fd0a566006ddc3c79872ba5fc1685b0c063d01d1bceab0ef15abcdc
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like