U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Is the Emergency Department an Inappropriate Venue for Code Status Discussions?



Details

  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Background: Historically, it has been assumed that the Emergency Department (ED) is a place for maximally aggressive care and that Emergency Medicine Providers (EMPs) are biased towards life-prolonging care. However, emphasis on early recognition of code status preferences is increasingly making the ED a venue for code status discussions (CSDs). In 2018, our hospital implemented a policy requiring EMPs to place a code status order (CSO) for all patients admitted through the ED. We hypothesized that if EMPs enter CSDs with a bias toward life-prolonging care, or if the venue of the ED biases CSDs towards life-prolonging care, then we would observe a decrease in the percentage of patients selecting DNR status following our institution's aforementioned CSO mandate. Methods: We present a retrospective analysis of rates of DNR orders placed for patients admitted through our ED comparing six-month periods before and after the implementation of the above policy. Results: Using quality improvement data, we identified patients admitted through the ED during pre (n=7,858) and post (n=8,069) study periods. We observed the following: after implementation DNR preference identified prior to hospital admission from the ED increased from 0.4% to 5.3% (relative risk (RR) 12.5; 95% CI: 5.2-29.9), defining CS in the ED setting at the time of admission increased from 2.4% to 98.6% (p <0.001), and DNR orders placed during inpatient admission was unchanged (RR=0.97 (95% CI = 0.88-1.07)). Discussion: Our results suggest that the ED can be an appropriate venue for CSDs. [Description provided by NIOSH]
  • Subjects:
  • Keywords:
  • ISSN:
    1049-9091
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Genre:
  • Place as Subject:
  • CIO:
  • Topic:
  • Location:
  • Pages in Document:
    253-259
  • Volume:
    38
  • Issue:
    3
  • NIOSHTIC Number:
    nn:20062635
  • Citation:
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2021 Mar; 38(3):253-259
  • Contact Point Address:
    Daniel G. Miller, MD, University of Iowa, 1008 RCP, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
  • Email:
    daniel-miller@uiowa.edu
  • Federal Fiscal Year:
    2021
  • Performing Organization:
    University of Iowa
  • Peer Reviewed:
    True
  • Start Date:
    20050701
  • Source Full Name:
    The American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
  • End Date:
    20290630
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:65f6fa7db83d8fd8e7f86ca2d8fbb4c12d65548cf1b6b699e1288af4b7bde603627f9fc0bce19aaae4ae9cc46fefb6e27e7ee5a400993580738511748b817e57
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 223.34 KB ]
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.