U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Comparison of Visual Versus Microscopic Methods to Detect Blood Splatter from an Intravascular Catheter with Engineered Sharps Injury Protection



Details

  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    OBJECTIVE. To determine whether retractable intravenous devices produced blood splatter and whether blood splatter frequency differed between visual and microscopy detection methods. METHODS. In this laboratory-based experiment, 105 venipunctures were performed in a simulated brachial vein containing mock venous blood. The retraction mechanism was activated in a testing chamber with precut fabric filters, placed at 3 different locations, to capture blood splatter. Differences in filter mass, visual inspection, and microscopic analysis for presence of blood on fiters were the units of analysis. Descriptive statistics, paired Student f tests, and K statistics were used for data analysis. RESULTS. Blood splatter was detected visually and microscopically as follows: filter A, 70% and 71%, respectively; filter B, 12% and 9%, respectively; and filter C, 13% and 10%, respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed in the mean mass of filter A between before and after activation when confirmed by the naked eye (P = .014) and microscopically (P = .0092). Substantial agreement between methods was observed for filter A (K = 0.78 [95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.92]), filter B (K = 0.73 [95% confidence interval, 0.51- 0.95]), and filter C (K = 0.75 [95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.96]). However, blood was detected by microscopy and not by the naked eye in 7 instances (7%). CONCLUSIONS. Our findings demonstrate that splatter, which can potentially expose healthcare workers (HCWs) to bloodborne pathogens, is associated with the activation of intravascular catheters with retraction mechanisms. HCWs may not detect this splatter when it occurs and may not report a splash to mucous membranes or nonintact skin. The need to wear personal protective equipment when using such devices is reinforced. [Description provided by NIOSH]
  • Subjects:
  • Keywords:
  • ISSN:
    0899-823X
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Genre:
  • Place as Subject:
  • CIO:
  • Topic:
  • Location:
  • Volume:
    34
  • Issue:
    11
  • NIOSHTIC Number:
    nn:20062586
  • Citation:
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013 Nov; 34(11):1174-1180
  • Contact Point Address:
    Donna Haiduven, PhD, CIC, University of South Florida, College of Public Health, Department of Global Health, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, MDC 56, Tampa, Florida 33612
  • Email:
    dhaiduve@health.usf.edu
  • Federal Fiscal Year:
    2014
  • Performing Organization:
    Sunshine Education Research Center, University of South Florida, Tampa
  • Peer Reviewed:
    True
  • Start Date:
    19970701
  • Source Full Name:
    Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
  • End Date:
    20020630
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:b771448f41fefb2b8c4a37217c4f863eaf8b721f76297d8f66833c6919a2410d825ba2fd34de4964eb85527c06de6d910199af9950a352d62a29edcc7161062a
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 2.33 MB ]
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.