Welcome to CDC Stacks | Two Homologous EF-G Proteins from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exhibit Distinct Functions - 22555 | CDC Public Access
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Two Homologous EF-G Proteins from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exhibit Distinct Functions
Filetype[PDF - 467.52 KB]


Details:
  • Pubmed ID:
    24260360
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC3832671
  • Funding:
    1SC3GM098173-01A1/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
    75DP001812/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
    SC3 GM098173/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
  • Document Type:
  • Collection(s):
  • Description:
    Genes encoding two proteins corresponding to elongation factor G (EF-G) were cloned from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The proteins encoded by these genes are both members of the EFG I subfamily. The gene encoding one of the forms of EF-G is located in the str operon and the resulting protein is referred to as EF-G1A while the gene encoding the other form of EF-G is located in another part of the genome and the resulting protein is referred to as EF-G1B. These proteins were expressed and purified to 98% homogeneity. Sequence analysis indicated the two proteins are 90/84% similar/identical. In other organisms containing multiple forms of EF-G a lower degree of similarity is seen. When assayed in a poly(U)-directed poly-phenylalanine translation system, EF-G1B was 75-fold more active than EF-G1A. EF-G1A pre-incubate with ribosomes in the presence of the ribosome recycling factor (RRF) decreased polymerization of poly-phenylalanine upon addition of EF-G1B in poly(U)-directed translation suggesting a role for EF-G1A in uncoupling of the ribosome into its constituent subunits. Both forms of P. aeruginosa EF-G were active in ribosome dependent GTPase activity. The kinetic parameters (K M) for the interaction of EF-G1A and EF-G1B with GTP were 85 and 70 μM, respectively. However, EF-G1B exhibited a 5-fold greater turnover number (observed k cat) for the hydrolysis of GTP than EF-G1A; 0.2 s(-1) vs. 0.04 s(-1). These values resulted in specificity constants (k cat (obs)/K M) for EF-G1A and EF-G1B of 0.5 x 10(3) s(-1) M(-1) and 3.0 x 10(3) s(-1) M(-1), respectively. The antibiotic fusidic acid (FA) completely inhibited poly(U)-dependent protein synthesis containing P. aeruginosa EF-G1B, but the same protein synthesis system containing EF-G1A was not affected. Likewise, the activity of EF-G1B in ribosome dependent GTPase assays was completely inhibited by FA, while the activity of EF-G1A was not affected.