Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence by Community Survey and Residual Specimens, Denver, Colorado, July-August 2020
Public Domain
-
2022/01/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:Alden NB ; Biggerstaff BJ ; Biggs HM ; Burket TL ; Cortese MM ; Drobeniuc J ; Foster MA ; Herlihy RK ; Kawasaki B ; Kugeler KJ ; Lim T ; McDonald E ; Podewils LJ ; Tate JE ; Zacks R
-
Description:Objectives: The number of SARS-CoV-2 infections is underestimated in surveillance data. Various approaches to assess the seroprevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 have different resource requirements and generalizability. We estimated the seroprevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in Denver County, Colorado, via a cluster-sampled community survey. Methods: We estimated the overall seroprevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 via a community seroprevalence survey in Denver County in July 2020, described patterns associated with seroprevalence, and compared results with cumulative COVID-19 incidence as reported to the health department during the same period. In addition, we compared seroprevalence as assessed with a temporally and geographically concordant convenience sample of residual clinical specimens from a commercial laboratory. Results: Based on 404 specimens collected through the community survey, 8.0% (95% CI, 3.9%-15.7%) of Denver County residents had antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, an infection rate of about 7 times that of the 1.1% cumulative reported COVID-19 incidence during this period. The estimated infection-to-reported case ratio was highest among children (34.7; 95% CI, 11.1-91.2) and males (10.8; 95% CI, 5.7-19.3). Seroprevalence was highest among males of Black race or Hispanic ethnicity and was associated with previous COVID-19-compatible illness, a previous positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, and close contact with someone who had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Testing of 1598 residual clinical specimens yielded a seroprevalence of 6.8% (95% CI, 5.0%-9.2%); the difference between the 2 estimates was 1.2 percentage points (95% CI, -3.6 to 12.2 percentage points). Conclusions: Testing residual clinical specimens provided a similar seroprevalence estimate yet yielded limited insight into the local epidemiology of COVID-19 and might be less representative of the source population than a cluster-sampled community survey. Awareness of the limitations of various sampling strategies is necessary when interpreting findings from seroprevalence assessments. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0033-3549
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:128-136
-
Volume:137
-
Issue:1
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20064033
-
Citation:Public Health Rep 2022 Jan/Feb; 137(1):128-136
-
Contact Point Address:Margaret M. Cortese, MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, MS H24-5, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
-
Email:mcortese@cdc.gov
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2022
-
NORA Priority Area:
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Source Full Name:Public Health Reports
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:8460ddb4d608953be083bcd919b56ba3e07a15e854f917d7541479a0a2c13e5607d18d3b124cf72a86958bdceafe4979baefb8fbb0626e3b39a4a37dd59d76ff
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like