Evaluation of Flat, Angled, and Vertical Computer Mice and Their Effects on Wrist Posture, Pointing Performance, and Preference
-
2015/09/01
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:BACKGROUND: Modern computer users use the mouse almost three times as much as the keyboard. As exposure rates are high, improving upper extremity posture while using a computer mouse is desirable due to the fact that posture is one risk factor for injury. Previous studies have found posture benefits associated with using alternative mouse designs, but at the cost of performance and preference. OBJECTIVE: To develop new computer mouse shapes, evaluate them versus benchmarks, and determine whether there are differences in wrist posture, pointing performance, and subjective measures. METHODS: Three concept mice were designed and evaluated relative to two existing benchmark models: a traditional flat mouse, and an alternative upright mouse. Using a repeated measures design, twelve subjects performed a standardized point-and-click task with each mouse. Pointing performance and wrist posture was measured, along with perceived fatigue ratings and subjective preferences pre and post use. RESULTS: All of the concept mice were shown to reduce forearm pronation relative to the traditional flat mouse. There were no differences in pointing performance between the traditional flat mouse and the concept mice. In contrast, the fully vertical mouse reduced pronation but had the poorest pointing performance. Perceived fatigue and subjective preferences were consistently better for one concept mouse. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing mouse height and angling the mouse topcase can improve wrist posture without negatively affecting performance. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1051-9815
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:245-253
-
Volume:52
-
Issue:2
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20063673
-
Citation:Work 2015 Sep; 52(2):245-253
-
Contact Point Address:Dan Odell, Synaptics, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA
-
Email:drdanodell@yahoo.com
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2015
-
Performing Organization:University of Washington
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:Work
-
End Date:20250630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:21552ed0aedfbd17cd47fb32d597b9018e1ab63e591a9bcc98823e0ab2cb71ada6350683f7eb54df7d81dd8dc14dd8d614f3342f94282dcd70d8dc3a871de670
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like