Effects of Spray Surfactant and Particle Charge on Respirable Dust Control
-
2013/12/13
-
By Raynor PC
-
Series: Grant Final Reports
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Inhalation exposures to respirable coal dust are a serious health concern for underground coal miners. One method used to limit these exposures is to spray water that contains surfactants to capture the airborne particles near the mining face. The goal of this research was to determine if surfactants that carry an electrical charge can enhance respirable particle capture through electrostatic attraction. In a laboratory setting, tests were conducted to measure the effects of particle diameter, surfactant type and concentration, and particle charge on the capture of respirable particles by surfactant-containing water spray droplets. Polystyrene latex particles with diameters of 0.6, 1.0, or 2.1 um or coal dust particles with a wide range of diameters were generated in a wind tunnel. Particles were given either an unneutralized, neutralized, net positive, or net negative charge, and then were allowed to be captured as they passed through sprays containing anionic, cationic, or nonionic surfactant, or they moved through the same spray section with the spray turned off. After passing through the spray region, the particles were sampled, charge-separated, and counted at various voltage levels. Comparisons of concentrations with the sprays on and off permitted the calculation of collection efficiency. Overall efficiencies were measured integrated across all charge levels, as well as efficiencies for particles at specific charge levels. The overall collection efficiency rose significantly with increasing particle diameter. Collection efficiencies of 22%, 59%, and 87%, on average, were observed for polystyrene latex particles 0.6, 1.0, and 2.1 um in diameter, respectively. The combination of surfactant classification and concentration significantly affected both overall spray collection efficiency and collection efficiency for particles with specific charge levels. Anionic (negatively-charged) and cationic (positively-charged) surfactant sprays had the best performance with charged particles having the opposite sign of charge and the worst performance for charged particles holding the same sign of charge. Nonionic surfactant-containing spray removed particles carrying relatively few charges more efficiently than the anionic or cationic surfactant sprays. Particle charge level impacted the spray collection efficiency as highly-charged particles were removed more efficiently than weakly-charged particles. Comparisons of measurements made with the polystyrene latex particles and the coal dust particles showed similar efficiency, indicating that the polystyrene particles are a suitable surrogate for the coal dust particles. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Series:
-
Publisher:
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:1-21
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20045162
-
NTIS Accession Number:PB2015-100625
-
Citation:Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, R01-OH-009768, 2013 Dec; :1-21
-
Contact Point Address:Peter C. Raynor, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of Minnesota, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, Mayo MC 807, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455
-
Email:praynor@umn.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2014
-
Performing Organization:University of Minnesota
-
Peer Reviewed:False
-
Start Date:20090915
-
Source Full Name:National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
-
End Date:20130914
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:c63c27542d2cd4d9860a35e09fcc1ff875ce0b19c45eb6b816def93b0c7d3d7baaea90e09a354c56cf842e84860e5d69cfb393858691997274fa8193424ad3a2
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like