Despite High-Risk Exposures, No Evidence of Zoonotic Transmission During a Canine Outbreak of Leptospirosis
Public Domain
-
2019/03/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:Artus A ; Beatty N ; Galloway R ; Guagliardo SAJ ; Iverson SA ; Klein R ; Kretschmer M ; LaFerla Jenni M ; Levy C ; Reindel A ; Reynolds L ; Schafer IJ ; Sunenshine R ; Sylvester T ; Venkat H ; Woodward P ; Yaglom H
-
Description:Leptospirosis is a bacterial zoonosis that affects many mammals, including humans and dogs; dogs can transmit the bacteria to humans, but the frequency of transmission and highest risk exposures are poorly understood. During 2016-2017, the Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Arizona Department of Health Services and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention investigated the zoonotic potential of a canine leptospirosis outbreak in the Phoenix metro area. We identified symptomatic persons exposed to canine leptospirosis cases by conducting active and passive surveillance. We tested dog owners (n = 9) and animal care providers (n = 109) for serological evidence of Leptospira spp. infection (via the microscopic agglutination test [MAT]) and interviewed these persons about their specific exposures to canine cases and general exposures to canine blood and urine. Through surveillance, seven symptomatic persons were identified; six were tested and all were negative by MAT, and of these six, four persons were negative by PCR (two did not have PCR testing). All serosurvey participants (n = 118) were also seronegative. Among animal care providers, bare skin contact with urine/blood from a canine case was reported by 23.2%; two persons reported dog urine splashing in their face. Veterinary technicians were more likely to have bare skin contact with blood from a canine case compared to veterinarians and boarding facility staff (p < 0.001). Infection control practices were inconsistent; when working with specimens from a canine leptospirosis case, 44.6% of participants reported always wearing gloves when working with urine (i.e., collecting specimens), and 54.5% always wore gloves when working with blood. Veterinary technicians were also most likely to engage in all activities involving potential urine/blood contact, such as conducting laboratory tests (p < 0.01). We therefore recommend that veterinary technicians specifically receive targeted education about infection control practices. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1863-1959
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:223-231
-
Volume:66
-
Issue:2
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20054407
-
Citation:Zoonoses Public Health 2019 Mar; 66(2):223-231
-
Contact Point Address:Ilana J. Schafer, Bacterial Special Pathogens Branch, Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
-
Email:ischafer@cdc.gov
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2019
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Source Full Name:Zoonoses and Public Health
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:d318903f2231804107e38f1357d0c36bc49e8aae6386c44827f1daaa5f1d167688229c88e57f9dea9b6b601333298d398c4ddb67ef2ed60936c23413cf423668
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like