Impact of Low Filter Resistances on Subjective and Physiological Responses to Filtering Facepiece Respirators
Supporting Files
Public Domain
-
Dec 27 2013
-
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:PLoS One
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Ten subjects underwent treadmill exercise at 5.6 km/h over one hour while wearing each of three identical appearing, cup-shaped, prototype filtering facepiece respirators that differed only in their filter resistances (3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm H2O pressure drop). There were no statistically significant differences between filtering facepiece respirators with respect to impact on physiological parameters (i.e., heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, transcutaneous carbon dioxide levels, tympanic membrane temperature), pulmonary function variables (i.e., tidal volume, respiratory rate, volume of carbon dioxide production, oxygen consumption, or ventilation), and subjective ratings (i.e., exertion, thermal comfort, inspiratory effort, expiratory effort and overall breathing comfort). The nominal filter resistances of the prototype filtering facepiece respirators correspond to airflow resistances ranging from 2.1 - 6.6 mm H2O/L/s which are less than, or minimally equivalent to, previously reported values for the normal threshold for detection of inspiratory breathing resistance (6 - 7.6 mm H2O/L/sec). Therefore, filtering facepiece respirators with filter resistances at, or below, this level may not impact the wearer differently physiologically or subjectively from those with filter resistances only slightly above this threshold at low-moderate work rates over one hour.
-
Subjects:
-
Source:PLoS One. 2013; 8(12).
-
Document Type:
-
Volume:8
-
Issue:12
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20043613
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:bb8be07cf1d9aacf922faa23f5873285bfa592bea95cfce4c1b75049b54a85b54e0f141110e1efd6d78bfdffe67bbdd598962e96aff55bae7ad557040325dda7
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like