Ergonomics and Human Factors in Endoscopic Surgery: A Comparison of Manual vs Telerobotic Simulation Systems
-
2005/08/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgical techniques expose surgeons to a variety of occupational hazards that may promote musculoskeletal disorders. Telerobotic systems for minimally invasive surgery may help to reduce these stressors. The objective of this study was to compare manual and telerobotic endoscopic surgery in terms of postural and mental stress. METHODS: Thirteen participants with no experience as primary surgeons in endoscopic surgery performed a set of simulated surgical tasks using two different techniques--a telerobotic master--slave system and a manual endoscopic surgery system. The tasks consisted of passing a soft spherical object through a series of parallel rings, suturing along a line 5-cm long, running a 32-in ribbon, and cannulation. The Job Strain Index (JSI) and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) were used to quantify upper extremity exposure to postural and force risk factors. Task duration was quantified in seconds. A questionnaire provided measures of the participants' intuitiveness and mental stress. RESULTS: The JSI and RULA scores for all four tasks were significantly lower for the telerobotic technique than for the manual one. Task duration was significantly longer for telerobotic than for manual tasks. Participants reported that the telerobotic technique was as intuitive as, and no more stressful than, the manual technique. CONCLUSIONS: Given identical tasks, the time to completion is longer using the telerobotic technique than its manual counterpart. For the given simulated tasks in the laboratory setting, the better scores for the upper extremity postural analysis indicate that telerobotic surgery provides a more comfortable environment for the surgeon without any additional mental stress. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0930-2794
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:19
-
Issue:8
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20057451
-
Citation:Surg Endosc 2005 Aug; 19(8):1064-1070
-
Contact Point Address:J. T. Dennerlein, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2005
-
Performing Organization:Harvard School of Public Health
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20030701
-
Source Full Name:Surgical Endoscopy
-
End Date:20050630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:c4728374ff22afd6b78bb5bd6628c6faffb24433d9759d60d6c5426607679ce824b20304b0bb2dbcbfbdce2d78f41dd83fde96c2cfa4c5d15b97c7b5ecb2d9fc
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like