Impact of Social and Technological Distraction on Pedestrian Crossing Behaviour: An Observational Study
-
2013/08/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Objectives: The objective of the present work was to study the impact of technological and social distraction on cautionary behaviours and crossing times in pedestrians. Methods: Pedestrians were observed at 20 high-risk intersections during 1 of 3 randomly assigned time windows in 2012. Observers recorded demographic and behavioural information, including use of a mobile device (talking on the phone, text messaging, or listening to music). We examined the association between distraction and crossing behaviours, adjusting for age and gender. All multivariate analyses were conducted with random effect logistic regression (binary outcomes) and random effect linear regression (continuous outcomes), accounting for clustering by site. Results: Observers recorded crossing behaviours for 1102 pedestrians. Nearly one-third (29.8%) of all pedestrians performed a distracting activity while crossing. Distractions included listening to music (11.2%), text messaging (7.3%) and using a handheld phone (6.2%). Text messaging, mobile phone use and talking with a companion increased crossing time. Texting pedestrians took 1.87 additional seconds (18.0%) to cross the average intersection (3.4 lanes), compared to undistracted pedestrians. Texting pedestrians were 3.9 times more likely than undistracted pedestrians to display at least 1 unsafe crossing behaviour (disobeying the lights, crossing mid-intersection, or failing to look both ways). Pedestrians listening to music walked more than half a second (0.54) faster across the average intersection than undistracted pedestrians. Conclusions: Distracting activity is common among pedestrians, even while crossing intersections. Technological and social distractions increase crossing times, with text messaging associated with the highest risk. Our findings suggest the need for intervention studies to reduce risk of pedestrian injury. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1353-8047
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:232-237
-
Volume:19
-
Issue:4
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20057197
-
Citation:Inj Prev 2013 Aug; 19(4):232-237
-
Contact Point Address:Dr Beth E Ebel, Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359960, Seattle, Washington 98104-2499, USA
-
Email:bebel@uw.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2013
-
Performing Organization:University of Washington
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:Injury Prevention
-
End Date:20250630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:8390dd96b5cef58db8cfd571645a73d33f06efbf7ad8947cfea28620a6021ef43588765a215ec3f69ff5769bc7896a1cdbec9d74f5c27dbb663369c591637391
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like