U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Repeat Surgery After Lumbar Decompression for Herniated Disc: The Quality Implications of Hospital and Surgeon Variation



Details

  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Background context: Repeat lumbar spine surgery is generally an undesirable outcome. Variation in repeat surgery rates may be because of patient characteristics, disease severity, or hospital- and surgeon-related factors. However, little is known about population-level variation in reoperation rates. Purpose: To examine hospital- and surgeon-level variation in reoperation rates after lumbar herniated disc surgery and to relate these to published benchmarks. Study design/setting: Retrospective analysis of a discharge registry including all nonfederal hospitals in Washington State. Methods: We identified adults who underwent an initial inpatient lumbar decompression for herniated disc from 1997 to 2007. We then performed generalized linear mixed-effect logistic regressions, controlling for patient characteristics and comorbidity, to examine the variation in reoperation rates within 90 days, 1 year, and 4 years. Results: Our cohort included 29,529 patients with a mean age of 47.5 years, 61% privately insured, and 15% having any comorbidity. The age-, sex-, insurance-, and comorbidity-adjusted mean rate of reoperation among hospitals was 1.9% at 90 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.1), with a range from 1.1% to 3.4%; 6.4% at 1 year (95% CI, 3.9-10.6), with a range from 2.8% to 12.5%; and 13.8% at 4 years (95% CI, 8.8-19.8), with a range from 8.1% to 24.5%. The adjusted mean reoperation rates of surgeons were 1.9% at 90 days (95% CI, 1.4-2.4) with a range from 1.2% to 4.6%, 6.1% at 1 year (95% CI, 4.8-7.7) with a range from 4.3% to 10.5%, and 13.2% at 4 years (95% CI, 11.3-15.5) with a range from 10.0% to 19.3%. Multilevel random-effect models suggested that variation across surgeons was greater than that of hospitals and that this effect increased with long-term outcomes. Conclusions: Even after adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidity, we observed a large variation in reoperation rates across hospitals and surgeons after lumbar discectomy, a relatively simple spinal procedure. These findings suggest uncertainty about indications for repeat surgery, variations in perioperative care, or variations in quality of care. [Description provided by NIOSH]
  • Subjects:
  • Keywords:
  • ISSN:
    1529-9430
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Genre:
  • Place as Subject:
  • CIO:
  • Topic:
  • Location:
  • Pages in Document:
    89-97
  • Volume:
    12
  • Issue:
    2
  • NIOSHTIC Number:
    nn:20056922
  • Citation:
    Spine J 2012 Feb; 12(2):89-97
  • Contact Point Address:
    Brook I. Martin PhD, MPH, Department of Orthopaedics, HB7541, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756-0001, USA
  • Email:
    Brook.I.Martin@Dartmouth.edu
  • Federal Fiscal Year:
    2012
  • Performing Organization:
    University of Washington
  • Peer Reviewed:
    False
  • Start Date:
    20050701
  • Source Full Name:
    The Spine Journal
  • End Date:
    20250630
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:f9263953531f330e00650259b6f2420f6e74882ae27b0f763d564c9298b143b649a3e95b5976c18e507cca9ca8a5337048b51a606d67287d8b4483f309a66c30
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 495.59 KB ]
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.