Pain Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer and Bone Metastases: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid
-
2013/02/15
Details
-
Personal Author:Body J-J ; Braun A ; Chung K ; Cleeland CS ; Clemons M ; Dansey R ; de Boer R ; Fallowfield L ; Jiang Q ; Lipton A ; Masuda N ; Mathias SD ; Oliveira CT ; Patrick DL ; Qian Y ; Salvagni S ; Stopeck A ; Tonkin K ; von Moos R
-
Description:BACKGROUND: In this study, the authors evaluated the effect of denosumab versus zoledronic acid (ZA) on pain in patients with advanced breast cancer and bone metastases. METHODS: The prevention of pain, reduction in pain interference with daily life activities, and the proportion of patients requiring strong opioid analgesics were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy phase 3 study comparing denosumab with ZA for preventing skeletal-related events in 2046 patients who had breast cancer and bone metastases. Patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form at baseline and monthly thereafter. RESULTS: Fewer patients who received denosumab reported a clinically meaningful worsening of pain severity (>/=2-point increase) from baseline compared with patients who received ZA, and a trend was observed toward delayed time to pain worsening with denosumab versus ZA (denosumab, 8.5 months; ZA, 7.4 months; P = .08). In patients who had no/mild pain at baseline, a 4-month delay in progression to moderate/severe pain was observed with denosumab compared with ZA (9.7 months vs 5.8 months; P = .002). Denosumab delayed the time to increased pain interference by approximately 1 month compared with ZA (denosumab, 16.0 months; ZA, 14.9 months; P = .09). The time to pain improvement (P = .72) and the time to decreased pain interference (P = .92) were similar between the groups. Fewer denosumab-treated patients reported increased analgesic use from no/low use at baseline to strong opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab demonstrated improved pain prevention and comparable pain palliation compared with ZA. In addition, fewer denosumab-treated patients shifted to strong opioid analgesic use. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0008-543X
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:Arizona ; Florida ; OSHA Region 10 ; OSHA Region 3 ; OSHA Region 4 ; OSHA Region 6 ; OSHA Region 9 ; Pennsylvania ; Texas ; Washington
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:119
-
Issue:4
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20056182
-
Citation:Cancer 2013 Feb; 119(4):832-838
-
Contact Point Address:Charles S. Cleeland, PhD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1100 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 221, Houston, TX 77030
-
Email:ccleeland@mdanderson.org
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2013
-
Performing Organization:University of Washington
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:Cancer
-
End Date:20250630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:1960016148643b2b6095e3c2f3a878b4af71f29426b949196d2c4e5506b0004ff77b7dd442a8139a14b76b3f005b6d8b870d303ca4a7dde223d54e149acb3542
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like