Comparison of 7-Day and Repeated 24-H Recall of Type 2 Diabetes

Details

• Personal Author:
  Bennett AV ; Bushnell DM ; Chiou CF ; Diehr P ; Patrick DL
• Description:
  Purpose: Patient reporting of type 2 diabetes symptoms in a questionnaire with a 7-day recall period was expected to be different from symptom reports using a 7-day diary with repeated 24-h recall based on cognitive theory of memory processes and prior literature. This study compared these two types of recall in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: One hundred and forty adults with T2D completed a daily diary for 7 days containing 9 T2D-related symptom and impact items. On day 7, patients completed the same items with a 7-day recall period. We examined the concordance of 7-day recall with summary descriptors of the daily reports and compared the scores and the discriminant ability of 7-day recall and mean of daily reports. Results: Seven-day recall was most concordant with the mean of daily reports. The average difference in scores was small (range 0.22-0.77 on 11-point scale) and less than 0.5 standard deviations. For some items, the difference was positively associated with the variation in daily reports. The discriminant ability was comparable. Conclusions: In this study population, a questionnaire with 7-day recall provided information consistent with a daily diary measure of the average week-long experience of T2D symptoms and impacts. [Description provided by NIOSH]
• Subjects:
  Behavior Blood Hematologic Diseases Occupational Health Safety Surveys And Questionnaires
• Keywords:
  Author Keywords: Questionnaires Blood Sugar Disorders Clinical Symptoms Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Mental Recall Questionnaires Signs And Symptoms Validation Studies
• ISSN:
  0962-9343
• Document Type:
  Text
• Funding:
  Grant
• Genre:
  Journal Article
• Place as Subject:
  California ; New York ; OSHA Region 10 ; OSHA Region 2 ; OSHA Region 9 ; Washington
• CIO:
  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
• Topic:
  Workplace Safety & Health
• Location:
  North America
• Volume:
  20
• Issue:
  5
• NIOSHTIC Number:
  nn:20055501
• Citation:
  Qual Life Res 2011 Jun; 20(5):769-777
• Contact Point Address:
  A. V. Bennett, Health Outcomes Research Group, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
• Email:
  bennetta@mskcc.org
• Federal Fiscal Year:
  2011
• Performing Organization:
  University of Washington
• Peer Reviewed:
  True
• Start Date:
  20050701
• Source Full Name:
  Quality of Life Research
• End Date:
  20250630
• Collection(s):
  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:07197eb9844553ee4980d78788d1d050e971578037b1bf8a0fcdd1ba47bf9af4691720cc90832d4d3b69052b8a0b50e87aec26153e75bb76f6db5032c685103a
• Download URL:
  https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/213338/cdc_213338_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 199.94 KB ]