Nonpharmacological Pain Management Approaches Among U.S. Construction Workers: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study
Public Domain
-
2025/03/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Background: U.S. construction workers experience high rates of injury that can lead to chronic pain. This pilot study examined nonpharmacological (without medication prescribed by healthcare provider) and pharmacological (e.g., prescription opioids) pain management approaches used by construction workers. Methods: A convenience sample of U.S. construction workers was surveyed, in partnership with the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Construction Sector Program. Differences in familiarity and use of nonpharmacological and pharmacological pain management approaches, by demographics, were assessed using logistic regression models. A boosted regression tree model examined the most influential factors related to pharmacological pain management use, and potential reductions in use were counterfactually modeled. Results: Of 166 (85%) of 195 participants reporting pain/discomfort in the last year, 72% reported using pharmacological pain management approaches, including 19% using opioids. There were significant differences in familiarity with nonpharmacological approaches by gender, education, work experience, and job title. Among 37 factors that predicted using pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain management approaches, training on the risks of opioids, job benefits for unpaid leave and paid disability, and familiarity with music therapy, meditation or mindful breathing, and body scans were among the most important predictors of potentially reducing use of pharmacological approaches. Providing these nonpharmacological approaches to workers could result in an estimated 23% (95% CI: 16%-30%) reduction in pharmacological pain management approaches. Conclusion: This pilot study suggests specific factors related to training, job benefits, and worker familiarity with nonpharmacological pain management approaches influence use of these approaches. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0271-3586
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:68
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20069861
-
Citation:Am J Ind Med 2025 Mar; 68(S1):S158-S170
-
Contact Point Address:Aurora B. Le, PhD, MPH, CSP, CPH, Department of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, 212 Adriance Lab Rd, MS-1266, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
-
Email:able@tamu.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2025
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Source Full Name:American Journal of Industrial Medicine
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:cdbd47ba032626a5d496fe08a5bbbdc371475fe6677ccb3b303a4bd4759816f04ef68a23f05b4c2795996498b702990944e7dfba9a9457414dd9ddb8cc3e0161
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like