U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Characterizing Posture and Associated Physiological Demand During Evacuation



Details

  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Crawling is recommended for accessing breathable air and avoiding gases during severe fire evacuations. Few studies have evaluated the physiological burden associated with crawling, but those that have agree that crawling places high physiological demands on the body. Furthermore, with the exception of walking upright, the effect of locomotion modalities on the speed of evacuation is sparsely researched. This study evaluated distance, velocity, and the physiological costs of evacuating using different locomotion methods. Twenty-four (24) college students (12 M/12F) traveled up to 91.44 m (m) in different postures: Upright Walking (UW), Stoop-Walking (SW), Foot and Hand Crawling (FHC), Knee and Hand Crawling (KHC), and Low Crawling (LC). Crawling velocities were significantly slower than bipedal velocities (p < 0.05). Of the three crawling postures, FHC was faster (p < 0.05) than both KHC and LC. Average velocities for FHC, KHC, and LC were 1.20, 0.84, and 0.77 m/s (m/s), respectively. Velocities in all crawling postures decreased substantially after the first 9.14 m of travel. The average maximum crawling distance measured in this study was<76.2 m. Physiological results demonstrated that crawling was more physically demanding than walking, represented by higher heart rates (HR), rates of oxygen consumption (VO2), ventilation rates (VE), and respiratory exchange ratios (RERs). Crawling was perceived by subjects to be much more difficult than walking, with many subjects unable to complete the 91.44 m course. Results of this study should be considered in the evaluation of current evacuation recommendations and in the design of future evacuation routes. [Description provided by NIOSH]
  • Subjects:
  • Keywords:
  • ISSN:
    0925-7535
  • Document Type:
    Text
  • Funding:
    Grant
  • Genre:
    Journal Article
  • Place as Subject:
  • CIO:
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
  • Topic:
    Workplace Safety & Health
  • Location:
    North America
  • Pages in Document:
    1-9
  • Volume:
    104
  • NIOSHTIC Number:
    nn:20068971
  • Citation:
    Saf Sci 2018 Apr; 104:1-9
  • Contact Point Address:
    Gerard A. Davis, 3310 Shelby Center for Engineering Technology, USA
  • Email:
    davisga@auburn.edu
  • Federal Fiscal Year:
    2018
  • Performing Organization:
    University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Peer Reviewed:
    True
  • Start Date:
    20050701
  • Source Full Name:
    Safety Science
  • End Date:
    20270630
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:55f1dba579fae13cfa24701843904cc6902d95098d6dac15f699ec0cac91883f8ecbccac32558fcd6d80be68188e1ceeccce935116ff5cf2a73ff73b90c8237f
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 928.71 KB ]
PREVIOUS
ON THIS PAGE
Details
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
BACK TO TOP