Impact of Military Type Footwear and Workload on Heel Contact Dynamics During Slip Events
-
2018/07/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Introduction: Slips, trips and falls due to an induced loss balance have been identified as the leading cause of occupational injuries. This study aimed to analyze the impact of two military boots, standard boot (STD) and minimalist boot (MIN) on slip events, before (PRE) and after (POST) a military type load carrying task. Methods: Sixteen male participants (age: 27 +/- 3.9 years; height: 178 +/- 6.2 cm, mass: 87 +/- 12.4 kg) were tested for heel kinematics using motion capture, during unexpected (US) and expected slips (ES) both before and after the task. Slip parameters of heel slip distance (HSD) and mean heel slip velocity (MHSV) were analyzed with a 2 (STD × MIN) × 2 (PRE × POST) × 2 (US × ES) repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Significantly greater HSD (p = 0.002) and MHSV (p = 0.001) were demonstrated in STD compared to MIN, regardless of the load carrying workload and the type of slip. No significant interactions between boots, workload and slip type were found. MIN exhibited a greater percent of non-hazardous slips compared to STD. Conclusions: Greater HSD and MHSV seen in STD, suggests that MIN performed better under slippery conditions. The military type workload and the type of slip did not appear to influence slip parameters, with boot differences seen as the major influence on these slip outcomes. MIN boot's better performance could be attributed to the minimalist sole, tread and groove pattern, lighter mass and flexible shaft aiding in better maneuvering under slippery conditions. Relevance to industry: Slip outcomes in two different military boots, before and after a military type load carrying workload are addressed. The lighter minimalist tactical boot outperformed the standard tactical boot, under slippery conditions. Findings from this study will help offer suggestions for footwear design in the military, especially for maneuvering slippery environment. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0169-8141
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:18-25
-
Volume:66
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20068962
-
Citation:Int J Ind Ergon 2018 Jul; 66:18-25
-
Contact Point Address:Harish Chander, 216 McCarthy, PO BOX: 6186, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA
-
Email:hchander@colled.msstate.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2018
-
Performing Organization:University of Alabama at Birmingham
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
-
End Date:20270630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:7d34626f0525cc3a16de266e5e7855f77d91859dbac7b3f2ca92ade6db98d53a85023b007eb9df387ab8792898ba81127e22620c99ab2f88e9285fc31ebdc254
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like