Using the Functional Comorbidity Index with Administrative Workers’ Compensation Data: Utility, Validity, and Caveats
-
2024/02/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Background: Chronic health conditions impact worker outcomes but are challenging to measure using administrative workers' compensation (WC) data.The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) was developed to predict functional outcomes in community-based adult populations, but has not been validated for WC settings. We assessed a WC-based FCI (additive index of 18 conditions) for identifying chronic conditions and predicting work outcomes. Methods: WC data were linked to a prospective survey in Ohio (N= 512) and Washington (N= 2,839). Workers were interviewed 6 weeks and 6 months after work- related injury. Observed prevalence and concordance were calculated; survey data provided the reference standard for WC data. Predictive validity and utility for control of confounding were assessed using 6-month work-related outcomes. Results: The WC based FCI had high specificity but low sensitivity and was weakly associated with work-related outcomes. The survey based FCI suggested more comorbidity in the Ohio sample (Ohio mean = 1.38; Washington mean = 1.14), whereas the WC based FCI suggested more comorbidity in the Washington sample (Ohio mean = 0.10; Washington mean = 0.33). In the confounding assessment, adding the survey based FCI to the base model moved the state effect estimates slightly toward null (<1% change). However, substituting the WC based FCI moved the estimate away from null (8.95% change). Conclusions: The WC-based FCI may be useful for identifying specific subsets of workers with chronic conditions, but less useful for chronic condition prevalence. Using the WC-based FCI cross-state appeared to introduce substantial confounding. We strongly advise caution-including state-specific analyses with a reliable reference standard-before using a WC based FCI in studies involving multiple states. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0271-3586
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:99-109
-
Volume:67
-
Issue:2
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20068816
-
Citation:Am J Ind Med 2024 Feb; 67(2):99-109
-
Contact Point Address:Jeanne M. Sears, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Box 357660, Seattle, WA 98195
-
Email:jeannes@uw.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2024
-
Performing Organization:University of Washington
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20220930
-
Source Full Name:American Journal of Industrial Medicine
-
End Date:20240929
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:daa11e24a229a8497469c4124298034499add6a1dec0e01d60b7eae5839925149091f9132f35a156062ab891654f8e512ec2ac0132e737b525c6423b36dadd8c
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like