Alumina Process Feasibility Study and Preliminary Pilot Plant Design. Task 1 Final Report. Comparison of Six Processes
Public Domain
-
1977/09/01
-
-
Series: Mining Publications
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:This study compares six nonbauxitic alumina processes with the objective of selecting the two most promising candidate processes for further study. The comparisons cover both technical and economic aspects of alumina process plants of commercial size in the United States. The processes considered were hydrochloric acid-clay (evaporative and gas-induced crystallization), nitric acid-clay, sulfurous acid-clay, anorthosite-lime sinter, and alunite. Technical appraisals for each process complete with process descriptions, heat and material balances, flowsheets, and equipment lists have been prepared based on published information available through the Bureau of Mines miniplant program and other nonproprietary sources. Technical and economic comparisons are made from which conclusions can be drawn for selecting the two most promising processes. This is the first study of a three-part program. See also OFR's 49-78 and 122(1)-(6)-80. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Series:
-
Subseries:
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:1-253
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:10011110
-
NTIS Accession Number:PB-286638
-
Citation:Reno, NV: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, J0265048, 1977 Sep; :1-253
-
Federal Fiscal Year:1977
-
Performing Organization:Kaiser Engineers, Inc., Oakland, CA
-
Peer Reviewed:False
-
Source Full Name:Reno, NV: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, J0265048
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:4fa9aee9ba114faefe945137411bee426ab6bd5bd22e5f3f639bade8560e8cb16e301d15bb678814ae27b1a828d093fe4ea8d54036043174b5873e4f8216f5d1
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like