U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Statistical evaluation of exposure assessment strategies



Details

  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Three statistical evaluation techniques were proposed and discussed for two types of exposure assessment strategies, categorization of exposure and estimation of actual personal exposure levels. Exposure categorization included ordinal but nonquantitative groupings and quantitative exposure intervals. Estimates of actual exposure levels included job by year exposure matrices and exposure prediction models. Sources of uncertainty were discussed for ordinal classification, exposure matrices and exposure prediction models. The magnitude of error in exposure assessment could be estimated quantitatively for exposure matrices and exposure prediction models. Statistical evaluation methods discussed included sensitivity analysis, cross validation techniques and field techniques. These methods were discussed with particular reference to exposure prediction models. Sensitivity analysis identified which exposure factors had the maximum effect on exposure estimates and identified exposure factor combinations predictive of exposure levels out of any reasonable range. Cross validation used models developed for one data subset, with accuracy of the model evaluated using the other data subset. Field testing was useful when limited data were available for cross validation or when prediction models were not developed from measurement data. This method directly measured validity of an exposure assessment by actual measurement of current exposure levels. Field testing was the most generally applicable method but had disadvantages of greater expense and nonreplicability of historic conditions within current operations. Cross validation was the best technique for assessing prediction models based on measured exposures. The author concludes that the type of validation technique for an exposure assessment depends in part on the type of assessment methodology. [Description provided by NIOSH]
  • Subjects:
  • Keywords:
  • ISSN:
    1047-322X
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Genre:
  • CIO:
  • Topic:
  • Location:
  • Volume:
    6
  • Issue:
    6
  • NIOSHTIC Number:
    nn:00200887
  • Citation:
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1991 Jun; 6(6):516-520
  • Federal Fiscal Year:
    1991
  • Peer Reviewed:
    True
  • Source Full Name:
    Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:a15f146d87fdb57278e6b5cabff281111ea55abb163f4a05c527187d136946cec5ea68adbfc099c942fc3ed84d445c4301cddf2b29ef43652f899bf84cf0108e
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 772.51 KB ]
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.