Possible progress and unresolved conflicts resulting from guidelines on good epidemiologic practices
Public Domain
-
1991/12/01
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:The Good Epidemiologic Practices guidelines required that those involved in epidemiological research produce a great deal more paperwork, quality control, quality assurance, documentation and attention to archiving the data base and results than was previously required before the guidelines were established. Whether these additional efforts will produce studies demonstrating greater quality, excellence, and conviction than had been earlier produced remained a question. Conflicts which can result when guidelines are established were reviewed. Quality control may be seen as an end in itself, when in reality it is the producing of a quality study which is the goal. In cases of litigation, the following of the rules can become the focus of disputes that do not really judge the quality of the study. It is possible that quality may have been excellent in a given study even though no formal quality control program was adopted. The exception of response epidemiology must also be considered. In these cases there are enough instances of harm being done to workers due to a specific cause even without running through a quality controlled study. In these cases the harmful agent must be removed immediately rather than waiting for a study to be designed and the fact proven after additional harm has been wrought. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0096-1736
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:33
-
Issue:12
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:00203859
-
Citation:J Occup Med 1991 Dec; 33(12):1261-1264
-
Federal Fiscal Year:1992
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Source Full Name:Journal of Occupational Medicine
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:75be3480d11c09523046df9adefcafceb2d39bcbd84738ca36f82da5ec8ce1c1c5cb47054511f020859e50342cd5be97ff029a0dd7bdee421f68a5f3d589e2e4
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like