Methodological considerations relevant to epidemiology studies of silica and lung cancer
-
1995/12/01
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Methodological factors affecting the interpretation of epidemiological studies examining the relationship between occupational exposure to silica (14808607) and lung cancer were reviewed. Data from three studies of Vermont granite workers, South African gold miners, and California diatomaceous earth mining and processing workers were used to illustrate methodological shortcomings in the quality of exposure assessment, control of confounders such as other workplace exposures and cigarette smoking, and the use of pulmonary fibrosis as a precursor to lung cancer. Sources of bias in epidemiologic research, particularly in studies of occupational exposures and lung cancer, were described and discussed. The author presented several recommendations to improve the quality of epidemiologic studies examining occupational silica exposure and lung cancer risk. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1047-322X
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:10
-
Issue:12
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:00232480
-
Citation:Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1995 Dec; 10(12):1049-1055
-
Contact Point Address:Harvey Checkoway, Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington, Box 357234, Seattle, Washington 98195
-
CAS Registry Number:
-
Federal Fiscal Year:1996
-
Performing Organization:University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:19940401
-
Source Full Name:Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
-
End Date:19960331
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:81ef30ed4ed076b121ce6f4a8564fc65ddf8393b66392a5425208c91d0f5e58fce576f1959bc2d6317436fed25be5ee09d07d3dbd5c47e7b8dac8c47daa62453
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like