Paying for Performance in Population Health: Lessons From Health Care Settings
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
i

Superseded

This Document Has Been Replaced By:

i

Retired

This Document Has Been Retired

i

Up-to-date Information

This is the latest update:

Paying for Performance in Population Health: Lessons From Health Care Settings
  • Published Date:

    Aug 15 2010

  • Source:
    Prev Chronic Dis. 7(5).
Filetype[PDF-301.20 KB]


Details:
  • Alternative Title:
    Prev Chronic Dis
  • Description:
    The appeal of pay-for-performance in health care derives from the conceptual view that paying doctors and hospitals more to deliver better care will encourage them to deliver better care. What lessons can be learned from the successes and failures of pay-for-performance in health care settings that apply to pay-for-performance in population health? We argue that pay-for-performance requires conditions that are not easily met in population health settings. Pay-for-performance has focused on narrow clinical problems whose success depends on identifiable actors with the motivation and resources to change clinical processes or outcomes. In contrast, population health has broad goals, many antecedents, and no single, identifiable fiduciary (a person who holds assets in trust for a beneficiary). Nevertheless, with careful attention, conditions for successful pay-for-performance in population health might be met.
  • Document Type:
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • File Type:
No Related Documents.

You May Also Like: