Endovascular therapy yields significantly superior outcomes for large vessel occlusions compared with intravenous thrombolysis: is it time to randomize
-
2013/09/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Background and purpose: We compared outcomes between endovascular (EV) therapy and intravenous (IV) thrombolysis in large vessel strokes. Methods: 223 patients who had received either IV (n=100) or EV (n=123) therapy were analyzed. Only patients with strokes involving the internal carotid artery terminus (ICA-T, n=45), the middle cerebral artery (M1, n=107) or the bifurcation branches (M2, n=71) were included. The primary endpoint was 3 month outcome based on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, good outcome defined as mRS ?2. Results: The good outcome was 44.7% in the EV group and 26% in the IV group (p=0.003, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.1). There was no difference in mortality or hemorrhage. For ICA-T occlusions, the good outcome was 27.6% in the EV and 0% in the IV group (p=0.004); for M1 occlusions, 40.6% in the EV versus 10.5% in the IV group (p=0.0006, OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.9 to 18.2); and for M2 occlusions, 76% in the EV versus 47.8% in the IV group (p=0.01, OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 10.2). For M1 occlusions, the death rate was 27.5% for the EV compared with 57.9% for the IV group (p=0.002, OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.6 to 8.3) with no difference observed in mortality for ICA-T or M2 occlusions. In the univariate analysis, age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and occlusion site were significant predictors of outcome and mortality (p<0.0001 for all). In the multivariable analysis, EV therapy (p=0.0004, OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.8 to 9) and younger age (p<0.0001, OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.9 to 0.98) were significant independent predictors of good outcome. Conclusions: There are significantly higher odds of a favorable outcome with EV compared with IV therapy for large vessel strokes. The data support the rationale of a randomized trial for large vessel occlusions. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1759-8478
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:430-434
-
Volume:5
-
Issue:5
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20049369
-
Citation:J Neurointervent Surg 2013 Sep; 5(5):430-434
-
Contact Point Address:Dr. A.T. Rai, Interventional Neuroradiology, West Virginia University Hospital, One Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV 26508
-
Email:ansaar.rai@gmail.com
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2013
-
Performing Organization:West Virginia University
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery
-
End Date:20250630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:d1defb06b0da771d5457c9c669258d6b71c80a63f73846c9bcf0b4bfe712c2a0122c12cecd3272ceb56c1d55299e6293c0c89e73b5150f4cec0f5966daa4291f
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like