Validation of biomarkers of CVD risk from dried blood spots in community-based research: methodologies and study-specific serum equivalencies
-
2015/12/01
Details
-
Personal Author:Berkman L ; Buxton OM ; Hall MH ; Marino M ; McDade TW ; McLean S ; Porter JH ; Samuelsson LB ; Sembajwe G
-
Description:Dried blood spot (DBS) methodology offers significant advantages over venipuncture in studies of vulnerable populations or large-scale studies, including reduced participant burden and higher response rates. Uncertainty about the validity of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk biomarkers remains a barrier to wide-scale use. We determined the validity of DBS-derived biomarkers of CVD risk versus gold-standard assessments, and study-specific, serum-equivalency values for clinical relevance of DBS-derived values. Concurrent venipuncture serum and DBS samples (n = 150 adults) were assayed in Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified and DBS laboratories, respectively. Time controls of DBS standard samples were assayed single-blind along with test samples. Linear regression analyses evaluated DBS-to-serum equivalency values; agreement and bias were assessed via Bland-Altman plots. Linear regressions of venipuncture values on DBS-to-serum equivalencies provided R(2) values for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and C-reactive protein (CRP) of 0.484, 0.118, and 0.666, respectively. Bland-Altman plots revealed minimal systematic bias between DBS-to-serum and venipuncture values; precision worsened at higher mean values of CRP. Time controls revealed little degradation or change in analyte values for HDL-C and CRP over 30 weeks. We concluded that DBS-assessed biomarkers represent a valid alternative to venipuncture assessments. Large studies using DBS should include study-specific serum-equivalency determinations to optimize individual-level sensitivity, the viability of detecting intervention effects, and generalizability in community-level primary prevention interventions. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1948-5565
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:285-297
-
Volume:61
-
Issue:3
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20049096
-
Citation:Biodemography Soc Biol 2015 Dec; 61(3):285-297
-
Contact Point Address:Orfeu M. Buxton, Department of Biobehavioral Health, 221 BBH Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
-
Email:Orfeu@PSU.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2016
-
Performing Organization:Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20070901
-
Source Full Name:Biodemography and Social Biology
-
End Date:20260831
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:6dde8057ad9503f1c7dfd46791b68b7829877fe3417739f1e2d9d14f989c279962c9136ca0645146c31f23d6a185b00d345db45d0f9f2542b6e38ad4a67e5b1c
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like