Development of a job-task-exposure matrix to assess occupational exposure to disinfectants among US nurses
-
2017/02/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:Camargo CA Jr. ; Dumas O ; Goldberg M ; Henneberger, Paul K. ; Le Moual N ; Quinot C ; Speizer FE ; Varraso R ; Wiley AS ; Zock JP
-
Description:Objectives: Occupational exposure to disinfectants is associated with work-related asthma, especially in healthcare workers. However, little is known about the specific products involved. To evaluate disinfectant exposures, we designed job-exposure (JEM) and job-task-exposure (JTEM) matrices, which are thought to be less prone to differential misclassification bias than self-reported exposure. We then compared the three assessment methods: self-reported exposure, JEM and JTEM. Methods: Disinfectant use was assessed by an occupational questionnaire in 9073 US female registered nurses without asthma, aged 49.68 years, drawn from the Nurses' Health Study II. A JEM was created based on self-reported frequency of use (1.3, 4.7 days/week) of 7 disinfectants and sprays in 8 nursing jobs. We then created a JTEM combining jobs and disinfection tasks to further reduce misclassification. Exposure was evaluated in 3 classes (low, medium, high) using product-specific cut-offs (e.g., <30%, 30-49.9%, >/=50%, respectively, for alcohol); the cut-offs were defined from the distribution of self-reported exposure per job/task. Results: The most frequently reported disinfectants were alcohol (weekly use: 39%), bleach (22%) and sprays (20%). More nurses were classified as highly exposed by JTEM (alcohol 41%, sprays 41%, bleach 34%) than by JEM (21%, 30%, 26%, respectively). Agreement between JEM and JTEM was fair-to-moderate (kappa 0.3 - 0.5) for most disinfectants. JEM and JTEM exposure estimates were heterogeneous in most nursing jobs, except in emergency room and education/administration. Conclusions: The JTEM may provide more accurate estimates than the JEM, especially for nursing jobs with heterogeneous tasks. Use of the JTEM is likely to reduce exposure misclassification. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1351-0711
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:130-137
-
Volume:74
-
Issue:2
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20048563
-
Citation:Occup Environ Med 2017 Feb; 74(2):130-137
-
Contact Point Address:Catherine Quinot, Inserm UMRS 1168, VIMA: Aging and Chronic Diseases, Epidemiological and Public Health Approaches, 16, avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, Villejuif cedex 94807, France
-
Email:catherine.quinot@inserm.fr
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2017
-
NORA Priority Area:
-
Performing Organization:Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20130901
-
Source Full Name:Occupational and Environmental Medicine
-
End Date:20170831
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:efec2e2c642aaa9c497fab99608403279af66a947c89c9b6ceaaaca698acf77d1c165934e5bc3bcbccfe9672c91e6fe31688aa430550b90791a0528af744b299
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like