Monitoring safety process performance with leading indicator safety audits

Details

• Personal Author:
  Van Bibber AM
• Description:
  Safety professionals are constantly striving to improve safety in the workplace and achieve the ultimate zero incident goal. Easy fixes and implementations are the first lines of attempt to work towards that goal. Over time, greater commitments and investments into continuous improvement will be necessary to maintain a higher level of performance and expectations within a safety program. Lagging indicators have long been used in safety as a measure of success. These indicators provide cost data and information about an injury or illness after it has occurred. However, this information can only provide knowledge of the effects or evidence of an injury. Leading indicators are specific items that can potentially explain or predict the possibility of a future incident. General research and information on leading indicators has been seen in occupational safety and health research in the past decade, with case studies only starting to appear within the last five years. The object of this study was to develop safety audits around leading indicators selected from past incident reports and monitor the performance of the key indicators selected at two dining halls at a large Midwestern university. Risk awareness assessments were distributed to full-time staff to study personal perceptions of risks in the work environment. Additionally, toolbox talks were conducted at staff meetings in an attempt to connect safety processes to personal perceptions of risk. Results indicated a statistically significant difference in the safety process performance between the two dining halls. Data from the safety audits were plotted on I-MR control charts. Control charts indicated out of control points for certain indicators in areas of the dining halls, which can demonstrate the increased risk of injury. Patterns in the control charts across multiple areas in one dining hall revealed an inventory control issue. The second dining hall experienced a safety behavior issue that was confirmed with information from the risk awareness assessments, but was not able to be monitored with the safety audits. This finding suggests the need for a lasting relationship with employees also, as safety audits may not be as successful with capturing safety-related behaviors. [Description provided by NIOSH]
• Subjects:
  Behavior Environmental Exposure Occupational Health Risk Assessment Risk Factors Safety Workplace
• Keywords:
  Exposure Levels Injuries Risk Factors Safety Measures Safety Practices Safety Programs Work Environment Workers
• Document Type:
  Text
• Funding:
  Grant
• Genre:
  Dissertation
• Place as Subject:
  Ohio ; OSHA Region 5
• CIO:
  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
• Topic:
  Workplace Safety & Health
• Location:
  North America
• Pages in Document:
  1-149
• NIOSHTIC Number:
  nn:20047847
• Citation:
  Athens, OH: Ohio University, 2015 Aug; :1-149
• Federal Fiscal Year:
  2015
• Performing Organization:
  Ohio University, Athens
• Peer Reviewed:
  False
• Start Date:
  20100701
• Source Full Name:
  Monitoring safety process performance with leading indicator safety audits
• End Date:
  20250630
• Collection(s):
  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:7670a4a733cb1d9871ab65e4283504a84318d21b9d3833f99d21c2a3ec9816bc12198e842f3151c2d9a226c16ff24634eebcb5e8a246e231efc36747c91773a3
• Download URL:
  https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/202807/cdc_202807_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 2.42 MB ]