Classification of neck/shoulder pain in epidemiological research: a comparison of personal and occupational characteristics, disability and prognosis among 12,195 workers from 18 countries
Peer Reviewed
-
2016/05/01
Details
-
Personal Author:Barrero LH ; Benavides FG ; Bitsios P ; Bonzini M ; Carugno M ; Cattrell A ; Chatzi L ; Coggon D ; Cox K ; Delclos G ; Derrett S ; Felknor, Sarah A. ; Felli VE ; Ferrario MM ; Freimann T ; Freire R ; Gimeno D ; Gray A ; Habib RR ; Harari F ; Harari N ; Harari R ; Harcombe H ; Harris EC ; Herbison P ; Hoe VCW ; Kadir MM ; Kelsall HL ; Kogevinas M ; Martinez JM ; Marziale MH ; Matsudaira K ; McBride D ; Merisalu E ; Monroy MV ; Ntani G ; Nyantumbu B ; Oha K ; Palmer KT ; Peiris-John RJ ; Pesatori AC ; Quintana LA ; Rojas M ; Sadeghian A ; Sadeghian F ; Salazar Vega EJ ; Sarquis LMM ; Sathiakumar N ; Serra C ; Sim, Malcolm R. ; Solidaki E ; Urquhart DM ; Vargas Prada S ; Walker Bone-K ; Warnakulasuriya SSP ; Wickremasinghe AR ; Yoshimura N
-
Description:To inform case-definition for neck/shoulder pain in epidemiological research, we compared levels of disability, patterns of association and prognosis for pain that was limited to the neck or shoulders (LNSP) and more generalised musculoskeletal pain that involved the neck or shoulder(s) (GPNS). Baseline data on musculoskeletal pain, disability and potential correlates were collected by questionnaire from 12,195 workers in 47 occupational groups (mostly office workers, nurses, and manual workers) in 18 countries (response rate = 70%). Continuing pain after a mean interval of 14 months was ascertained through a follow-up questionnaire in 9,150 workers from 45 occupational groups. Associations with personal and occupational factors were assessed by Poisson regression and summarised by prevalence rate ratios (PRRs). The one-month prevalence of GPNS at baseline was much greater than that of LNSP (35.1% vs. 5.6%), and it tended to be more troublesome and disabling. Unlike LNSP, the prevalence of GPNS increased with age. Moreover, it showed significantly stronger associations with somatising tendency (PRR 1.6 vs. 1.3) and poor mental health (PRR 1.3 vs. 1.1); greater variation between the occupational groups studied (prevalence ranging from 0% to 67.6%) that correlated poorly with the variation in LNSP; and was more persistent at follow-up (72.1% vs. 61.7%). Our findings highlight important epidemiological distinctions between sub-categories of neck/shoulder pain. In future epidemiological research that bases case definitions on symptoms, it would be useful to distinguish pain which is localised to the neck or shoulder from more generalised pain that happens to involve the neck/shoulder region. Description provided by NIOSH
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
- Musculoskeletal-system
- Musculoskeletal-system-disorders
- Risk-factors
- Analytical-processes
- Demographic-characteristics
- Sociological-factors
- Age-groups
- Humans
- Men
- Women
- Questionnaires
- Pain-tolerance
- Statistical-analysis
- Neck-injuries
- Epidemiology
- Diagnostic-techniques
- Disabled-workers
- Health-surveys
- Occupations
- Office-workers
- Manual-materials-handling
- Nurses
- Racial-factors
- Mathematical-models
- Author Keywords: Neck pain
- shoulder pain
- diagnostic classification
- case definition
- disability
- associations
- prognosis
-
ISSN:0304-3959
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:157
-
Issue:5
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20047399
-
Citation:Pain 2016 May; 157(5):1028-1036
-
Contact Point Address:Professor David Coggon, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
-
Email:dnc@mrc.soton.ac.uk
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2016
-
Performing Organization:University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:Pain
-
End Date:20250630
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:689d9de200dcc4c94295a829214717c2ed022f13047fade7858eef6e2bd182b276d4aa9f2063efe0498581873ef2621b6eca3d206ce4bdcf6aad7af97f3b8508
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like